Evaluating the Implementation of Mover Teacher Education Program of English Language Teachers in West Nusa Tenggara

Authors

  • Untung Waluyo Universitas Mataram, Indonesia
  • Sudirman Wilian Universitas Mataram, Indonesia
  • Sudirman Sudirman Universitas Mataram, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v11i4.9051

Keywords:

Evaluation, Mover Teacher Program, Education Policy,

Abstract

The Mover Teacher Program (MTP), released in 2021, is widely regarded as a crucial measure towards achieving substantial transformations in the field of education in Indonesia. The present study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the MTP in Sumbawa Besar City. Through this study, we sought evidence of lessons learnt from the field. To conduct the study, researchers employed a modified version of Kirkpatrick’s evaluation model. Three out of four postulates derived from the model were used to probe the phenomenon under investigation, i.e. (1) teachers’ reaction, (2) learning endeavor and (3) application of knowledge/skills gained. The fourth postulate regarding the assessment of students’ achievement was not included in the study as the MTP program just commenced in the research site. The study employed a qualitative research approach with a multiple-case design. Participants of this study were eight alumni of MTP teachers coming from four different schools. Data were collected through interviews, observations and study of related documents. The data collected were analyzed thematically through data reduction, data presentation, conclusion drawing and verification. Results of the study show that participants of the study benefitted from participating in the MTP program although they underwent various route of transformational learning. Regardless of disorienting problem in the beginning of the program implementation, participants were able to maintain their new skills and knowledge to improve their own teaching performance and other teachers in the impacted schools. The participants experienced transformation of learning and behavioral change after participating in the long and exhausting MTP program.

Author Biographies

Untung Waluyo, Universitas Mataram

English Language Education, Faculty of Teachers Training, Universitas Mataram

Sudirman Wilian, Universitas Mataram

English Language Education, Faculty of Teachers Training, Universitas Mataram

Sudirman Sudirman, Universitas Mataram

English Language Education, Faculty of Teachers Training, Universitas Mataram

References

Aditiya, N., & Fatonah, S. (2023). Efforts to Develop the Competence of Mover Teachers in Primary Schools in the Independent Learning Curriculum. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 2, 108–116. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2023.v13.i2.p108-116

Afrina, M., Siska, J., Agusta, O. L., Sasongko, R. N., & Kristiawan, M. (2022). The policy of mover school as a catalyst for improving the quality of education. JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia), 8(1), 108. https://doi.org/10.29210/020221639

Aliyyah, R. R. (2020). Novateur Publication , India. In EVALUATION MODEL OF EDUCATION PROGRAMS (Issue October). Novateur Publication.

Azmiyah, U., & Astutik, A. P. (2021). The Role of The Movement Teacher in Preparing Indonesia’s Excellent Generation. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:250159746

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1163/22118993-90000268

Domitrovich, C. E., Gest, S. D., Gill, S., Bierman, K. L., Welsh, J. A., & Jones, D. (2009). Fostering High-Quality Teaching With an Enriched Curriculum and Professional Development Support:The Head Start REDI Program. American Educational Research Journal, 46(2), 567–597. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208328089

Fairman, J., Smith, D. L., Pullen, P. C., & Lebel, S. J. (2020). The challenge of keeping teacher professional development relevant. Professional Development in Education, 49, 197–209. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:224932405

Forbes, M. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Evaluation Journal of Australasia, 22(2), 132–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X211058251

Guskey, T. R. (2021). Professional Learning with Staying Power. Educational, School, and Counseling Psychology Faculty Publications.

Hargreaves, A. (2005). Educational change takes ages: Life, career and generational factors in teachers’ emotional responses to educational change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 967-983.

Hasanah, E., Suyatno, S., Maryani, I., Badar, M. I. Al, Fitria, Y., & Patmasari, L. (2022). Conceptual Model of Differentiated-Instruction (DI) Based on Teachers’ Experiences in Indonesia. Education Sciences, 12(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100650

Hirsch, S. E., Ely, E., Lloyd, J. W., & Isley, D. (2018). Targeted Professional Development: A Data-Driven Approach to Identifying Educators’ Needs. School—University Partnerships, 11(2), 84–91.

Ho, D., & Lee, M. (2016). Capacity building for school development: current problems and future challenges. School Leadership & Management, 36, 493–507. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:151551101

Istiyarini, P. (2022). Culture in the Frame of Multicultural Religiosity Guru Penggerak and Transforming Schools Withing the Framework of Appreciative Inquiry. 1st Nusantara International Conference, 316–323.

Jannah, M., & Junaidi, J. (2020). Faktor Penghambat Guru sebagai Fasilitator dalam Pembelajaran Sosiologi di SMAN 2 Batusangkar. Jurnal Sikola: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 1(3), 191–197. https://doi.org/10.24036/sikola.v1i3.25

Kirkpatrick, J. D., & Kirkpatrick, W. K. (2007). Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Training Evaluation.

Kurniawaty, I., & Faiz, A. (2022). The Concept of Ethical Dilemma in Decision-Making: A Literature Review in the Empowered Teacher Module. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(3), 4862–4868. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i3.2961

Liljedahl, P. (2014). Approaching Professional Learning: what teachers want. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 11(1), 109–132. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:122880978

Makovec, D. (2018). The Teacher’s Role And Professional Development. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 6(2), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.5937/ijcrsee1802033M

Mardiha, S. M., & Alibakhshi, G. (2020). Teachers’ personal espistemological beliefs and their conceptions of teaching and learning: A correlational study. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1763230. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1763230

Marliyani, T., & Iskandar, S. (2022). Program Sekolah Penggerak (PSP) Terhadap Kinerja dan Manajemen Kepala Sekolah. Jurnal Basicedu. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:251353685

Marmoah, S., Istiyati, S., Mahfud, H., Supianto, S., & Sukarno, S. (2022). Persepsi Guru terhadap Implementasi Program Sekolah Penggerak di Sekolah Dasar. DWIJA CENDEKIA: Jurnal Riset Pedagogik, 6(2), 362–271. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:253702955

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. SAGE Publications.

Ngabiyanto, Isnarto, Pramono, D., Saputro, I. H., & Utomo, A. P. Y. (2022). A Teacher’s Perception of Government Policy About the Mover Teacher. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Science, Education and Technology (ISET 2020), 574(Iset 2020), 359–366. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211125.067

PytlikZillig, L. M., Hutchens, M. J., Muhlberger, P., Gonzalez, F. J., & Tomkins, A. J. (2018). Policy Acceptance. In Deliberative Public Engagement with Science: An Empirical Investigation (pp. 89–116). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78160-0_5

Ramdani, M., Zurqoni, Z., & Zamroni, Z. (2023). The Influence of School Principal Leadership and Teacher Work Motivation on the Implementation of the Mover School Program. EDUSAINTEK: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains Dan Teknologi, 10(3), 1081–1095. https://doi.org/10.47668/edusaintek.v10i3.938

Sijabat, O. P., Manao, M. M., Situmorang, A. R., Hutauruk, A. J. B., & Panjaitan, S. M. (2022). Mengatur Kualitas Guru Melalui Program Guru Penggerak. Journal of Educational Learning and Innovation (ELIa), 2(1), 130–144. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:247401126

Taylor, H. (2017). School-Community Collaboration: An Approach for Integrating and Democratizing Knowledge. Penn GSE Perspectives on Urban Education, 1(Penn GSE Perspect. Urban Educ.), 1–5.

Thurlings, M., & Brok, P. J. Den. (2017). Learning outcomes of teacher professional development activities: a meta-study. Educational Review, 69, 554–576. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:53978213

Ubit, F., & Bartholomaeus, P. (2018). Teachers professional development at a tsunami-affected school in Banda Aceh. International Education Journal, 17(2), 102–114.

Welp, A., Johnson, A., Nguyen, H., & Perry, L. (2018). The importance of reflecting on practice: How personal professional development activities affect perceived teamwork and performance. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27, 3988–3999. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:21737764

Downloads

Published

2023-10-16

How to Cite

Waluyo, U., Wilian, S., & Sudirman, S. (2023). Evaluating the Implementation of Mover Teacher Education Program of English Language Teachers in West Nusa Tenggara. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 11(4), 709–721. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v11i4.9051

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 4 (2023)

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  1. They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  2. The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  3. That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  4. That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  5. They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  6. They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.

Copyright
Authors who publish with JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Licensing for Data Publication

JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching uses a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.