English Teachers’ Tecnological Knowledge and Some Barriers on It: The Basis for Developing TPACK Teaching Model

Authors

  • Muliani Muliani Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika, Indonesia
  • Sri Sukarni Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika, Indonesia
  • Jumadil Jumadil Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i1.9628

Keywords:

Technological Knowledge, TPACK

Abstract

Along with the dynamic development of technology and the need for technology integration in today's learning, technology has become an important element in educational organizations. programs and applications that have been mastered by teachers, namely PowerPoint, Google Translate, Google Doc, the internet, and all forms of technological offerings can undoubtedly support the blended learning pattern which then becomes a learning necessity. Teachers' content and and pedagogical knowledge must be supported by their technological knowledge. The aim of this research is to conduct qualitative research by means of doing semi-structured interview and checking teachers' daily journals about technologies applied in their teaching and learning processes and also the problems of applying those technologies. It was found that there are some technologies commonly used as the instruments of teaching by those 10 teachers in their teaching and learning processes after the pandemic such as: Google Meet, Google Classroom, and WA Group. Next to that, it was also found that there are some common barriers experienced by the teachers in the application of those technologies, such as: hardware and software problems, connectivity, financial problem, protection of personal information, technical support, lack of face-to-face interaction, psychological problems, and language barrier. The result if this research is expected that it can be used as the basis to develop appropriate technologies for teaching English for students to support their CK and PK regarding the implementation of TPACK at school.

Author Biographies

Muliani Muliani, Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika

English Language Education, Faculty of Culture, Management, and Business, Mandalika University of Education

Sri Sukarni, Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika

English Language Education, Faculty of Culture, Management, and Business, Mandalika University of Education

Jumadil Jumadil, Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika

English Language Education, Faculty of Culture, Management, and Business, Mandalika University of Education

References

Al-Shorbaji N, Atun R, Car J, Majeed A, Wheeler E (eds) (2015). E-learning for undergraduate health professional education - a systematic review informing a radical transformation of health workforce development. World Health Organization, Geneva. Available from: http:// whoeducationguidelines.org/ content/elearning-report. Accessed June 05, 2020.

Alves P, Uhomoibhi J. (2013). Issues of e-learning standards and identity management for mobility and collaboration in higher education.CampusWideInf.Syst.Availablefrom:http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/10650741011033053?journalCode=cwis.Accessed June 18, 2016.

Amankwa, Eric. (2021). Relevance of Cyber Security Education at Pedagogy Levels in Schools. Journal of Information Security, 2021, 12, 233-249 https://doi.org/10.4236/jis.2021.124013. Analysis Of Hongkong’S Target-Oriented Curriculum Initiative. International Review Of Education; 43(4): 349–366.

Annamalai, Nagaletchimee 2021. Online Learning during COVID-19 Pandemic. Are Malaysian High School Students Ready?. Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 29 (3): 1571 - 1590.

Bhatia RP (2011). Features and effectiveness of e-learning tools. Global J Business Management Inform Tech. Vol. 1, Page 1-7.

Carless R David. 1997. Managing Systemic Curriculum Change: A Critical Childs S, Blenkinsopp E, Hall A, Walton G. (2005). Effective e-learning for health professionals and students - barriers and their solutions. A systematic review of the literature — findings from the HeXL project. Health Inf. Library Journal. Vol. 22, page 20-32.

Chu LF, Chan BK. (1998). Evolution of web site design: implications for medical education on the Internet. Computer Bio. Med. Vol. 28, Page 459-72.

Dhir, S. K.; Verma, D.; Batta, M.; Mishra, D. (2017). E-Learning in Medical Education in India. Indian Pediatrics. Volume 54__October 15, 2017.

Gerdprasert S, Pruksacheva T, Panijpan B, Ruenwongsa P. (2011). An Interactive web-based learning unit to facilitate and improve intrapartum nursing care of nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. Vol. 31, Page 531-535.

Goldsworthy S, Lawrence N, Goodman W. (2006). The use of personal digital assistants at the point of care in an undergraduate nursing program. Computer Inform Nurs. Vol. 24, Page: 138-143.

Hadley J, Kulier R, Zamora J, Coppus SFPJ, Weinbrenner S, Meyerrose B, et al. (2010). Effectiveness of an e-learning course in evidence-based medicine for foundation [internship] training. J R Soc Med. Vol. 13, Page: 288-294.

Harden RM. (2002). Myths and e-learning. Med Teach. Vol. 24, Page: 469-472.

Haq, Ziaul , Mohammad . 2020. E-Learning During the Period of Pandemic (COVID-19) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: An Empirical Study. American Journal of Educational Research, 2020, Vol. 8, No. 7, 457-464

Hung, M.-L. (2016). Teacher readiness for online learning: Scale development and teacher perceptions. Computers & Education, 94, 120-133

Jeffries PR, Woolf S, Linde B. (2003). Technology-based vs. traditional instruction. A comparison of two methods for teaching the skill of performing a 12-lead ECG. Nurs Educ. Perspect. Vol. 24, Page: 70-74.

Klamma R, Chatti MA, Duval E, Hummel H, Hvannberg EH, Kravcik M, et al. (2007). Social software for life-long learning. Educational Technology Society. Vol. 10, page: 72-83.

Kodrat, Denny. 2020. Mindset Shift in Cyber Pedagogy: A Teacher's Strategy upon Learning from Home. Jurnal Kajian Peradaban Islam, JKPIs , Pages 27 –32 , Vol. 3, No. 2, 2020.

Lase, Depitir. 2019. Education and Industrial Revolution 4.0. Jurnal Handayani (JH). Vol 10 (1) Juni 2019, hlm 48-62

Luis A. Benveniste And Patrick J. Mcewan. 2000. Constraints To Implementing Educational Innovations: The Case Of Multigrade School. International Review Of Education 46(1/2): 31–48, 2000.

Makawawa Cristi Junita , Ali Mustadi , Jewish Van Septriwanto, Falenthino Sampouw , Roeth A.O Najoan. 2021. Primary school teachers perception of technological pedagogical content knowledge in online learning due to Covid 19. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 9(1), 85-95. doi:https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v9i1.35245

Meyer SM. (2001). The adoption of technology in higher nursing education. Curationis. Vol. 24, page 32-36.

Naing C, Wai VN, Durham J, Whittaker MA, Win NN, Aung K, et al. (2015). A systematic review and meta-analysis of medical American Journal of Educational Research 464 students’ perspectives on the engagement in research. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015; 94: e1089.

Prayetno, Muhammad iqbal , Jamaludin , Windawati Pinem,. (2022) (a). Using The Technical Teacher Application (Gl 4.0) In The Post Pandemic. Devotion, Journal of Research and Community Service; Volume 3, Number 11 September 2022

Prayetno, Prayetno, Jamaludin, Jamaludin, & Pinem, Windawati. (2022)(b). Layang Teacher Platform In The Cyber Pedagogy Room. Eduvest-Journal Of Universal Studies, 2(3), 580–587.

Qureshi IA, Ilyas K, Yasmin R. Whitty M. (2012). Challenges of implementing e-learning in a Pakistani university. Knowledge Management E-Learn Int. 2012; 4:310-24.

Randell D. (2001). E-learning for continuing education: exploring a new frontier. Med Lab Obs. 2001; 33:24-8.

Sarker, F.H.; Islam, M.S.; Islam, M.K. (2019). Use of e-learning at higher educational institutions in Bangladesh: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education Vol. 11 No. 2, 2019 pp. 210-223.

Toumas M, Basheti IA, Bosnic-Anticevich S. Z. (2009). Comparison of small-group training with self-directed internet based training in inhaler techniques. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009; 73:85.

Yeung JC, Fung K, Wilson TD. (2012). Prospective evaluation of a web-based three-dimensional cranial nerve stimulation. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012; 41:426-36.

Yulisman Hendra , Widodo Ari , Riandi, Nurina Cut Intan Evtia. 2019. The Contribution Of Content, Pedagogy, And Technology On The Formation Of Science Teachers’ TPACK Ability. Edusains,11 (2), 2019, 173-185

(The TPACK Framework Explained (With Classroom Examples) | PowerSchool) accessed on October 2023

Downloads

Published

2024-01-09

How to Cite

Muliani, M., Sukarni, S., & Jumadil, J. (2024). English Teachers’ Tecnological Knowledge and Some Barriers on It: The Basis for Developing TPACK Teaching Model. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 12(1), 499–510. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i1.9628

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 1 (2024)

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  1. They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  2. The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  3. That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  4. That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  5. They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  6. They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.

Copyright
Authors who publish with JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Licensing for Data Publication

JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching uses a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.