Evaluation of The Implementation of Merdeka Curriculum in Economics Learning at Senior High Schools in Yogyakarta City

Authors

  • Yohanes Bosco Adi Praseyo Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Ali Muhson Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • James Leonard Mwakapemba Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Tanzania, United Republic of

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v10i4.11969

Keywords:

Economic, Learning Evaluation, Indipendent Curriculum, Countenance Stake.

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the implementation of the independent curriculum implementation in senior high school economics learning which includes the components: (1) antecendents, (2) transactions, and (3) outcomes. This research used a quantitative approach with the Countenance Stake evaluation model. The subjects of this study consisted of 143 students and 4 public high school economics teachers in Yogyakarta City. Data collection was carried out using questionnaires, document reviews, and observations that were validated using Aiken content validity and Exploratory Factor Analysis construct validity. Reliability estimation of this study used Cronbach Alpha formula. The data analysis technique used quantitative descriptive analysis. The results of this study indicated that in the aspect of preparation (antecendents) of economic learning in the category of very good by obtaining an average score of 90%, which includes the characteristics of learning planning documents, the completeness of the contents of learning documents, preliminary learning steps, and learning strategies. In the aspect of implementation (transaction) of economic learning in the very good category by obtaining an average score of 88.07%, which includes learning that was interactive, inspiring, fun, challenging, motivating, providing initiative and creativity, and providing role models, mentoring and facilitation. In the aspect of economic learning outcomes in the good category by obtaining an average score of 73.59%, which includes skills assessment, knowledge assessment of daily tests, mid-semester summative, end-of-semester summative, and assessment of student attitudes.

References

Afrizal, A., Vebrianto, R., & Anwar, A. (2022). Methods in the Learning Process: Case Studies on Implementation. Buana Pendidikan: Jurnal Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 18(1), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.36456/bp.vol18.no1.a5158

Aljowaysir, N., Ozdemir, T. O., & Kim, T. (2019). Differentiated learning patterns with mixed reality. 2019 IEEE Games, Entertainment, Media Conference, GEM 2019, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/GEM.2019.8811558

Amalia, K., Rasyad, I., & Gunawan, A. (2023). Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi sebagai Inovasi pembelajaran. Journal Of Education And Teaching Learning (JETL), 5(2), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.51178/jetl.v5i2.1351

Ananda, R., & Rafida, T. (2017). Pengantar Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. In Perdana Publishing (Vol. 53, Issue 9).

Anastasiu, D. P., & Bold, N. (2016). Forming tests from questions with different theoretical and practical degree. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 677, 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52039-1_6

Andriani, W. (2020). Pentingnya Perkembangan Pembaharuan Kurikulum dan Permasalahannya. Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/rkjsg

Apriyanti, H. (2023). Penyusunan Perencanaan Pembelajaran Pada Kurikulum Merdeka. Education Journal : Journal Educational Research and Development, 7(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.31537/ej.v7i1.970

Aziz, F. Z., Setiawan, F., Hariadi, D., & Setianingsih, F. N. (2022). Transformasi kebijakan kurikulum pendidikan di Indonesia sebagai landasan pengelolaan pendidikan. Attractive : Innovative Education Journal, 4(2), 217–228. https://www.attractivejournal.com/index.php/aj/

Byrne, L. B. (2016). Learner-centered teaching activities for environmental and sustainability studies. In Learner-Centered Teaching Activities for Environmental and Sustainability Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28543-6

Dickensheets DL, Kreitinger S, Peterson G, Heger M, R. M. (2019). HHS Public Access. Opt.Lett, 42(7), 1241–1244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-018-0908-4.Continuous

Elsara, W., & Maiwen, S. (2019). English Teachers’ Difficulties in Implementing Authentic Assessment in Speaking Skill. 301(Icla 2018), 255–259. https://doi.org/10.2991/icla-18.2019.42

Hamrick, J. B., Friesen, A. L., Behbahani, F., Guez, A., Viola, F., Witherspoon, S., Anthony, T., Buesing, L., VeliÄković, P., & Weber, T. (2021). on the Role of Planning in Model-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning. ICLR 2021 - 9th International Conference on Learning Representations.

Hubertz, M., & Campenhout, R. Van. (2022). Teaching and Iterative Improvement: The Impact of Instructor Implementation of Courseware on Student Outcomes. – The IAFOR International Conference on Education – Hawaii 2022 Official Conference Proceedings, 201–210. https://doi.org/10.22492/issn.2189-1036.2022.19

Kim, K. N. (2019). Teachers’ administrative workload crowding out instructional activities. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 39(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2019.1572592

Kruit, P., Oostdam, R., van den Berg, E., & Schuitema, J. (2020). Performance Assessment as a Diagnostic Tool for Science Teachers. Research in Science Education, 50(3), 1093–1117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9724-9

Kurniawati, W. (2021). DESAIN PERENCANAAN PEMBELAJARAN. Bermain Sebagai Sarana Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Usia Dini, 7(1), 1–10.

Ladyshewsky, R., & Taplin, R. (2015). Evaluation of curriculum and student learning needs using 360 degree assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(5), 698–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.950189

Laia, S. A. (2019). The Analysis of Teachers’ Lesson Plan Through Behavioural Objectives Theory. 2nd International Conference on Educational Assessment and Policy (ICEAP 2019), Iceap, 64–68. https://doi.org/10.2991/conaplin-16.2017.2

Langee, P., Gyamfi, A., Yeboah, A., & Adu, I. A. (2022). Performance Assessment: Effective Tool Closing Academic Achievement Gap Between High and Low Ability Students. Canadian Journal of Educational and Social Studies, 2(6), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.53103/cjess.v2i6.78

Novitasari, A. T. (2022). Keterlaksanaan Pembelajaran Efektif Melalui Peran Profesionalisme Pendidik Dalam Proses Pembelajaran. Journal on Education, 5(1), 1179–1188. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i1.624

Oktavia, F. T. A., Maharani, D., & Qudsiyah, K. (2023). Merdeka Belajar Pada Pembelajaran. Edumatic, 4, 14–23.

Prof. Nikolaos Tzenios. (2022). Academic Doctoral Learning Plan. 1.

Retnawati, H. (2016a). Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian.

Retnawati, H. (2016b). PROVING CONTENT VALIDITY OF SELF-REGULATED LEARNING SCALE (THE COMPARISON OF AIKEN INDEX AND EXPANDED GREGORY INDEX) Heri. 2(2), 155–164.

Rihada, A. M., Jagat, R. S. A., & Setiabudi, D. I. (2021). Refleksi guru dalam pengembangan pembelajaran berdasarkan hasil PISA (Programme for Interational Student Assessment). Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 1(Juli), 1–8.

Salma, N., & Prastikawati, E. F. (2021). Performance-Based Assessment in the English Learning Process: Washback and Barriers. Getsempena English Education Journal, 8(1), 164–176. https://doi.org/10.46244/geej.v8i1.1305

Sari, E. C. (2022). Kurikulum Di Indonesia: Tinjauan Perkembangan Kurikulum Pendidikan. Inculco Journal of Christian Education, 2(2), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.59404/ijce.v2i2.54

Schmidthaler, E., Hormann, C., Schalk, M., Sabitzer, B., & Lavicza, Z. (2022). The importance of a quality assessment for educational applications perceptions of secondary school students regarding non-certified learning apps. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 266–273. https://doi.org/10.1145/3572549.3572592

Schoenfeld, A. H. (2017). On learning and assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 24(3), 369–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1336986

Sibuea, A. M., Amin, M., Mustaqim, B., & Tumanggor, G. (2023). The Evaluation of Implementation Merdeka Curriculum at The Centre of Excellence Vocational High School. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 9(4), 1280. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v9i4.8589

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. L. S. (2014). EVALUATION THEORY, MODELS, AND APPLICATIONS.

Suharsimi Arikunto, C. S. A. J. (2018). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.

Suingariyev, Z., Kunanbayeva, D., Kunanbayeva, A., & Molchanov, M. (2020). The Role of Quality Education in the Mechanism of Transparency State Authorities. E3S Web of Conferences, 159. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202015909015

Suryani, N., Muspawi, M., & Aprillitzavivayarti, A. (2023). Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar di Sekolah Penggerak. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 23(1), 773. https://doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v23i1.3291

Suyud, R., Syam, E., Fuadi, S. I., & Adawiyah, R. (2023). Urgensi Penyesuaian Sekolah Terhadap Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar. Penelitian Pendidikan Dan Bahasa, 1(2), 49–59.

Syarief Hidayatulloh, F. (2023). Hubungan Beban Kerja, Perencanaan SDM, dan Kinerja Guru. Journal of Education and Teaching (JET), 4(1), 128–139. https://doi.org/10.51454/jet.v4i1.231

Zhao, Y., & Watterston, J. (2021). The changes we need: Education post COVID-19. Journal of Educational Change, 22(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-021-09417-3

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2024-12-21

How to Cite

Praseyo, Y. B. A., Muhson, A., & Mwakapemba, J. L. (2024). Evaluation of The Implementation of Merdeka Curriculum in Economics Learning at Senior High Schools in Yogyakarta City. Jurnal Kependidikan, 10(4), 1633–1641. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v10i4.11969

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 4 (2024): December

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities tacitly or explicitly of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.

Copyright
Authors who publish with JK agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Licensing for Data Publication

JK use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.