Characteristics and Relationship Between Eco-Literacy Competencies and Independent Curriculum Indonesian Language Learning Objectives Middle School Level in Indonesia

Authors

  • Ayyu Subhi Farahiba Universitas Trunojoyo Madura, Indonesia
  • Mega Puspitasari Universitas Trunojoyo Madura, Indonesia
  • Khusnul Khotimah Universitas Trunojoyo Madura, Indonesia
  • Febi Ayu Pramithasari Universitas Trunojoyo Madura, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v10i4.12828

Keywords:

Eco-Literacy, Learning Objective, Independent Curriculum, Competence.

Abstract

The research aims to examine the characteristics of eco-literacy-based Indonesian language learning and to design a link between eco-literacy competencies and the objectives of Indonesian language learning in the Merdeka curriculum at the junior high school level as a curative solution to overcome environmental problems in Indonesia. This study uses a qualitative approach with design as a content analysis of the latest curriculum documents in Indonesia. The data collection technique is the documentation technique, using data sources from independent curriculum documents at the junior high school level. To obtain valid and reliable data, reading, listening, and analyzing basic competencies that intersect with environmental education are done. The data analysis technique is organization, synthesis, and identification. The research results show that ecoliteracy-based Indonesian language learning strategies include problem-solving, simulations, demonstrations, environmental-themed projects, discovery-based learning, and experiments. All Indonesian language learning texts in classes VII and VIII include head, hands, and heart aspects. The head aspect is related to learning objectives in the cognitive domain, which requires students to master the ability to identify, interpret, compare, and analyze environmentally friendly texts. The hand aspect is related to learning objectives in the psychomotor domain which requires students to be able to practice, write, and speak in accordance with environmentally friendly texts. The heart aspect is related to learning objectives in the affective domain, namely, requiring students to empathize with environmental issues.

References

Bruyere, B. L. (2020). The Effect of Environmental Education on the Ecological Literacy of First-Year College Students. January 2008. https://doi.org/10.2134/jnrlse2008.37120x

Corbin, J. (2015). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory 4th. Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. W. (2017). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design_ Choosing among Five Approaches. Sage Publications.

Elo, S., & Kynga¨s, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x

Goleman, D., Bennett, L., & Barlow, Z. (2012). Ecoliterate: How educators are cultivating emotional, social, and ecological intelligence. Jossey-Bass.

Igbokwe, B. A. (2016). Scholarship at UWindsor Environmental Literacy Assessment : Assessing the Strength of an Environmental Education Program ( EcoSchools ) in Ontario Secondary Schools for Environmental Literacy Acquisition Environmental Literacy Assessment : Assessing the Strength of an Environmental.

Ihsan, A. F., & Hanami, Z. A. (2021). Implementasi Ekoliterasi di Era Pascaliterasi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Adiwidya 8 Pascasarjana ITB, January. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348522744_Implementasi_Ekoliterasi_di_Era_Pascaliterasi

Isnanda, R., Sayuti, M., Rinaldi, R., & Hatta, U. B. (2022). Learning Indonesian Language With An Ecoliteration Insight As A Media For Formation Of Environmental Character For Elementary School Student. Jurnal CERDAS Proklamator, 10(2), 185–194.

Keraf, A. S. (2010). Etika lingkungan hidup. Penerbit Kompas.

Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content Analysis An Introduction to Its Methodology 4th. Sage Publications.

Lapan, S. D., MaryLynn, T. Q., & Riemer, F. D. (2012). Qualitative Research. Jossey-Bass.

Mahananingtyas, E. (2017). Hasil Belajar Kognitif, Afektif Dan Psikomotor Melalui Penggunaan Jurnal Belajar Bagi Mahasiswa PGSD. Prosiding Seminar Nasional HDPGSDI Wilayah IV, 192–200.

Martyanti, A., & Suhartini. (2018). Etnomatematika : Menumbuhkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Melalui Budaya. 1(1), 35–41.

Maulana, M. A., Kanzunnudin, M., & Masfuah, S. (2021). Analisis Ekoliterasi Siswa pada Sekolah Adiwiyata di Sekolah Dasar Muhammad. 5(4), 2601–2610.

Ramadhan, A. F., Surjanti, J., Surabaya, U. N., & Lingkungan, S. P. (2022). Pengaruh ekoliterasi dan pendekatan esd terhadap sikap peduli lingkungan peserta didik. 10(3), 129–134.

Rondli, W. S., & Khoirinnida, Y. (2017). Pembelajaran Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Berbasis Ecoliteracy: Upaya Rekonstruksi Kewarganegaraan Ekologis. Prosiding Seminar Nasional, 114–122.

Sarmiasih, M. (2018). Gerakan Literasi Ekologi (Ekoliterasi) Kritis Sebagai Respon Terhadap Isu Pemanasan Global.

Sengupta, M. (2010). Environmental Awareness and Environment Related Behaviour of Twelfth Grade Students in Kolkata : Effects of Stream and Gender. 5(January), 1–8.

Setiawati, T. (2023). Peningkatan Kecerdasan Ekologis Peserta Didik Dalam Bertransportasi Hemat Bbm Melalui Pembelajaran IPS Kontekstual (PTK di Kelas VII A SMP Negeri 2 Tomo Kabupaten Sumedang Pada Materi Kelangkaan Sumber Daya Alam). International Journal Pedagogy of Social Studies, 8(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijposs.v1i2.4713

Sigit, D. V., & Ristanto, R. H. (2019). Ecological Literacy , Environmental Awareness , Academic Ability and Environmental Problem-Solving Skill at Adiwiyata School. December. https://doi.org/10.31002/ijose.v3i2.1114

Sulaiman, L. (2020). Pengaruh Metode Pembelajaran Dan Berpikir Kritis Terhadap Kemampuan Menulis Argumentasi. Teaching And Learning Journal Of Mandalika (Teacher), 1(1), 32–38. ttps://doi.org/10.36312/teacher.v1i1.36

Supriatna, N. (2020). Ecopedagogy: Membangun Kecerdasan Ekologis dalam Pembelajaran IPS. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Surakusumah, W. (2010). Konsep Pendidikan Lingkungan di Sekolah : Model Uji Coba Sekolah Berwawasan Lingkungan. FMIPA Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Suwandi, S., Drajati, N. A., Handayani, A., & Tyarakanita, A. (2024). The analysis of Ecoliteracy elements in language textbooks. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2300907

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2024-12-21

How to Cite

Farahiba, A. S., Puspitasari, M., Khotimah, K., & Pramithasari, F. A. (2024). Characteristics and Relationship Between Eco-Literacy Competencies and Independent Curriculum Indonesian Language Learning Objectives Middle School Level in Indonesia. Jurnal Kependidikan, 10(4), 1392–1402. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v10i4.12828

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check