Analyzing Student's Science Identity in Science Learning: A Survey Research

Authors

  • Alnafa I'anatul Maula Department of Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Nanang Winarno Department of Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Herman Jufri Andi Department of Physics Education, Universitas Islam Madura
  • Erna Risfaula Kusumawati Department of Data Science, Universitas Islam Negeri Salatiga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v12i3.11000

Keywords:

Science Identity, Science learning, Survey research, Gender

Abstract

The exploration of students' science identity in Indonesian junior high schools is limited. However, science identity is a crucial factor in influencing students' decision to pursue a career in science. This study aims to analyze students' science identity in science learning, specifically focusing on gender differences. The survey method was used, and an instrument was adopted to measure science identity in science learning among junior high school students, utilizing a 5-point Likert scale. The questionnaire consisted of a total of 26 items, including 6 in science performance, 6 in competence, 6 in recognition scales, 6 in interest scales, and 2 open-ended questions. The research sample included 1092 junior high school students from West and East Java, Indonesia. The results revealed that there were no significant differences in the mean science identity between male and female students. However, females had slightly higher averages in science performance and competence, while males had higher recognition scores. This research contributes to the development of science identity, aiming to enhance students' learning outcomes and future careers in science. It emphasizes that science is a field that is open to both genders.

Author Biography

Alnafa I'anatul Maula, Department of Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Student in International Program in Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI).

References

Aschbacher, P. R., Li, E., & Roth, E. J. (2010). Is science me? High school students’ identities, participation and aspirations in science, engineering, and medicine. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 564–582. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20353

Barmby, P., Kind, P. M., Jones, K., & Kind, P. M. (2008). Secondary School Science Examining Changing Attitudes in Secondary School Science. October 2013, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701344966

Beghetto, R. A. (2007). Factors associated with middle and secondary students’ perceived science competence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 800–814. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20166

Birr, E., Eli, M., Varelas, M., & Pappas, C. C. (2007). FORUM : Giving oneself over to science – Exploring the roles of subjectivities and identities in learning science. 593–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-006-9016-y

Brickhouse, N. W., Lowery, P., & Schultz, K. (2000). What kind of a girl does science? The construction of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200005)37:5<441::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-3

Brotman, J. S., & Moore, F. M. (2008). Girls and science: A review of four themes in the science education literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(9), 971–1002. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20241

Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237

Chen, S., & Wei, B. (2022). Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure High School Students’ Science Identity in Science Learning. Research in Science Education, 52(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09932-y

Digest, T., Created, W. A. S., Eric, B. Y., & Resources, T. H. E. E. (1992). Questions in Reading . ERIC / TM Digest . Open-Ended Questions in Reading . ERIC / TM Digest . 1–5.

Gee, J. P. (1998). Chapter 3 Identity as an Analytic Lens for Research in Education. 99–125.

Gibson, H. L., & Chase, C. (2002). Longitudinal Impact of an Inquiry-Based Science Program on Middle School Students’ Attitudes Toward Science. Science Education, 86(5), 693–705. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10039

Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Shanahan, M. C. (2010). Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 978–1003. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20363

Hill, P. W., McQuillan, J., Spiegel, A. N., & Diamond, J. (2018). Discovery Orientation, Cognitive Schemas, and Disparities in Science Identity in Early Adolescence. Sociological Perspectives, 61(1), 99–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121417724774

Ikhwan, M., Sadd, M., Tek, O. E., Baharom, S., Manusia, F. P., Pendidikan, U., & Idris, S. (2011). SELF-REGULATED LEARNING : GENDER DIFFERENCES IN MOTIVATION AND LEARNING STRATEGIES AMONGST Learning process is a part of students ’ life which occurs in a formal and non formal situation . Formally , teacher should have the knowledge and skills not only i. Jurnal Pendidikan Bitara Upsi, 4.

Ireland, D. T., Freeman, K. E., Winston-Proctor, C. E., DeLaine, K. D., McDonald Lowe, S., & Woodson, K. M. (2018). (Un)Hidden Figures: A Synthesis of Research Examining the Intersectional Experiences of Black Women and Girls in STEM Education. Review of Research in Education, 42(1), 226–254. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18759072

Jufrida, J., Basuki, F. R., Kurniawan, W., Pangestu, M. D., & Fitaloka, O. (2019). Scientific literacy and science learning achievement at junior high school. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(4), 630–636. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i4.20312

Le, A. V., Bui, T. D., Tran, M. N., Phung, T. T. T., & Vu, V. L. (2023). Gender gap in mathematics achievement: Vietnamese students in American Mathematics Competitions. Issues in Educational Research, 33(1), 137–154.

Nicholls, M. E. R. (2010). Likert Scales. The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology, 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0508

Piraksa, C., Srisawasdi, N., & Koul, R. (2014). Effect of Gender on Student’s Scientific Reasoning Ability: A Case Study in Thailand. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 486–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.245

Robinson, K. A., Perez, T., Carmel, J. H., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2019). Science identity development trajectories in a gateway college chemistry course: Predictors and relations to achievement and STEM pursuit. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 56(January), 180–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.01.004

Sanpanich, N. (2021). Investigating Factors Affecting Students’ Attitudes toward Hybrid Learning. REFLections, 28(2), 208–227.

Shein, P. P., Falk, J. H., & Li, Y. Y. (2019). The role of science identity in science center visits and effects. Science Education, 103(6), 1478–1492. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21535

Taufiq, M., Wijayanti, A., & Fajriah, E. (2020). The implementation of e-comic earth layer to enhance students’ self-directed learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1567(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/2/022070

Teo, T. W., & Yeo, L. W. (2017). Gender studies of science & science education in Singapore. Asian Women, 33(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.14431/aw.2017.09.33.3.1

Trujillo, G., & Tanner, K. D. (2014). Approaches to Biology Teaching and Learning Considering the Role of Affect in Learning : Monitoring Students ’ Self-Efficacy , Sense of Belonging , and Science Identity CAN BE IMPORTANT IN BIOLOGY TEACHING BELIEFS ABOUT HIS OR HER ABILITY TO DO. 13, 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-12-0241

Tucker-Raymond, E., Varelas, M., Pappas, C. C., Korzh, A., & Wentland, A. (2007). “they probably aren’t named Rachelâ€: Young children’s scientist identities as emergent multimodal narratives. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(3), 559–592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-006-9017-x

Vincent-Ruz, P., & Schunn, C. D. (2018). The nature of science identity and its role as the driver of student choices. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0140-5

Williams, D. R., Brule, H., Kelley, S. S., & Skinner, E. A. (2018). Science in the Learning Gardens (SciLG): a study of students’ motivation, achievement, and science identity in low-income middle schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0104-9

Woods-McConney, A., Oliver, M. C., McConney, A., Schibeci, R., & Maor, D. (2014). Science Engagement and Literacy: A retrospective analysis for students in Canada and Australia. International Journal of Science Education, 36(10), 1588–1608. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.871658

Downloads

Published

2024-06-26

How to Cite

Maula, A. I., Winarno, N., Andi, H. J., & Kusumawati, E. R. (2024). Analyzing Student’s Science Identity in Science Learning: A Survey Research. Prisma Sains : Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 12(3), 399–410. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v12i3.11000

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 3: July 2024

Section

Research Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

 Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.