HOTS-authentic Assessment Model Implementation of Tissue Structure Materials in High School of Malang: A pre-validation Final Draft
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v7i2.1997Keywords:
HOTS, Authentic assessment, Tissue structure materialsAbstract
Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) must be owned by students, and need to be assessed authentically. This study aimed to 1) analyze the efforts of high school teachers in Malang in developing a HOTS-authentic assessment in tissue structure materials; and 2) analyze the pre-validation final draft of the HOTS-authentic assessment model on tissue structure materials. The research method used was Research and Development (R&D). However, in line with the objectives, this publication only focuses on define, design, and develop. The developed part is only on the product (a pre-validation final draft). The research was carried out in state high schools in Malang (SSHS 1, 3, 4, 7, and 8). The study was conducted in April-November 2018. The subjects were 2 teachers from each school (10 teachers in total). Research data and findings were analyzed by descriptive-analytic qualitative. The results showed that teachers have included or considered HOTS aspects in lesson plans. However, the development of HOTS aspects and their assessment were not able to be carried out maximally. In practice, in a greater percentage, teachers use lesson plans without modification or making adjustments to student conditions. They modify and incorporate the HOTS aspect if there is an opportunity to discuss with other part who guide them. Therefore, the existence of this assessment model is very needed. The pre-validation final draft is essentially in the form of concepts that can be linked to the MGMP activities, and various related part, in an interactive and cyclical relationship (as a model for professional development of biology teachers).References
Afandi, A., Hidayat, S., & Syahri, I. (2019). Developing interactive questions to measure the higher-order thinking skills of senior high schools’ students. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 5(2), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i2.7747
Afrianto, A. (2017). Challenges of using portfolio assessment as an alternative assessment method for teaching English in Indonesian schools. International Journal of Educational Best Practices, 1(2), 106. https://doi.org/10.31258/ijebp.v1n2.p106-114
Al Kadri, H. M., Al-Moamary, M. S., Magzoub, M. E., Roberts, C., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2011). Students’ perceptions of the impact of assessment on approaches to learning: a comparison between two medical schools with similar curricula. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 44–52. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4ddb.fc11
Archer, A. L., & Hughes, C. A. (2011). Exploring the foundations of explicit Instruction. In Explicit Instruction: Effective and Efficient Teaching (pp. 1–22). Spring Street, New York: The Guilford Press.
Aryani, I. (2017). Efektifitas penggunaan modul pembelajaran pada mata kuliah ekologi hewan materi populasi hewan. In Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains II UKSW (pp. 41–47). Surakarta: UKSW.
Corebima, A. D. (2016). Pembelajaran biologi di Indonesia bukan untuk hidup. In Proceeding Biology Education Conference (Vol. 13, pp. 8–22).
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2019). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 0(0), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Dinni, H. N. (2018). HOTS (High Order Thinking Skills) dan kaitannya dengan kemampuan literasi matematika. In PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika (Vol. 1, pp. 170–176). Semarang: UNNES.
Direktorat Pembelajaran. (2018). Panduan program hibah penugasan dosen di sekolah (PDS). Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pembelajaran dan Kemahasiswaan-Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi.
Djumhana, N. (2008). Implementasi pengembangan rencana pelaksanaan pembelajaran. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Fadillah, E. N. (2017). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian untuk mengukur keterampilan proses sains siswa SMA. Didaktika Biologi, 1(2), 123–134. Retrieved from http://jurnal.um-palembang.ac.id/dikbio/article/view/770/701
Fitriani, F. (2017). Implementing authentic assessment of Curriculum 2013: Teacher’s problems and solusions. Getsempena English Education Journal (GEEJ), 4(2), 164–171.
Gerlach, J. M. (1994). Is this collaboration? New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1994(59), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219945903
Guth, K. D. (2016). Assessment of higher order thinking skills in a literature based curriculum challenges and guidelines. University of South Africa. University of South Africa. Retrieved from http://uir.unisa.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10500/21599/thesis_guth_kd.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Ichsan, I. Z., Hasanah, R., Ain, S., Ristanto, R. H., & Miarsyah, M. (2019). Higher order thinking skills assessment based on environmental problem (HOTS-AEP): Mendesain evaluasi pembelajaran abad 21. Jurnal Biotek, 7(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.24252/jb.v7i1.7939
Khoiriyah, K., Jalmo, T., & Abdurrahman, A. (2018). Development of assessment instrument higher order thinking skills on science subjects for student grade eight junior high school. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 8(2), 19–29. Retrieved from http://repository.lppm.unila.ac.id/3260/25/developement HOTS instruments.pdf
Lindawati, L., Saregar, A., & Yuberti, Y. (2016). Pengembangan instrumen authentic assessment untuk mengukur higher order thinking skills peserta didik. In Seminar Nasional Pendidikan (pp. 140–149). Bandarlampung: Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17250.73920
Lodang, H., Azis, A. A., Palennari, M., & Ardiansyah, R. (2011). Analisis kompetensi profesional guru biologi sekolah menengah atas negeri di kota makassar. Jurnal Bionature, 14(1), 25–32. Retrieved from https://ojs.unm.ac.id/index.php/bionature/article/download/1444/515
Lom, B. (2012). Classroom activities: Simple strategies to incorporate student-centered activities within undergraduate science lectures. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 11(1), 64–71.
Maftukhah, A., & Roshayanti, F. (2016). Analisis representasi tingkat berpikir kritis pada instrumen asesmen UTS gasal tahun 2015/ 2016 biologi kelas XI SMA di Kota Semarang. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sains dan Entrepreneurship III Tahun 2016 (pp. 216–222). Semarang: Universitas PGRI Semarang.
Mcmahon, G. P. (2007). Getting the HOTS with what’s in the box: Developing higher order thinking skills within a technology-rich learning environment. Curtin University of Technology.
Narendra, F. D. (2019). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian berbasis HOTS pada kompetensi dasar menerapkan buku jurnal kelas X akuntansi SMK. Jurusan Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial- Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan -Universitas Sanata Dharma.
Ngabekti, S. (2006). Buku ajar dengan pendekatan jelajah alam sekitar (JAS): Ekologi. Semarang: FMIPA UNNES.
Pantiwati, Y., & Husamah, H. (2017). Self and peer assessments in active learning model to increase metacognitive awareness and cognitive abilities. International Journal of Instruction, 10(4), 185–202. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.10411a
Perdhana, A. I., & Hariyatmi, H. (2019). Profil instrumen penilaian pembelajaran biologi kelas X Di SMA Muhammadiyah Se-Kota Surakarta semester genap tahun ajaran 2018/2019. In Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Biologi dan Saintek (SNPBS) ke-IV 2019 (Vol. 2019, pp. 552–561). Surakarta: UMS. Retrieved from https://publikasiilmiah.ums.ac.id/bitstream/handle/11617/11369/p.552 - 561.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Permendikbud 2016. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan nomor 24 tahun 2016 tentang kompetensi inti dan kompetensi dasar pelajaran pada Kurikulum 2013 pada pendidikan dasar dan pendidikan menengah, Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan § (2016). Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-4534(89)90112-3
Poluakan, C., & Tilaar, A. F. (2018). They categorized lower order thinking skills but they answer incorrectly: How is the opposite? In Proceeding Book of 1st International Conference on Educational Assessment and Policy (Vol. 2, pp. 10–17). Jakarta: Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan, Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Priadi, M. A., Sudarisman, S., & Suparmi, S. (2012). Pembelajaran biologi model PBL menggunakan eksperimen laboratorium dan lapangan ditinjau dari kemampuan berfikir analisis dan sikap peduli lingkungan. In Seminar Nasional IX Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UNS (pp. 322–328). Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia: Universitas Sebelas Maret. Retrieved from https://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/prosbio/article/view/1097
Ramdiah, S., Abidinsyah, A., Royani, M., & Husamah, H. (2019). Understanding, planning, and implementation of HOTS by senior high school biology teachers in Banjarmasin-Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 425–440. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12128a
Ramdiah, S., Abidinsyah, H., Mayasari, R., Education, B., Program, S., & Kalimantan, S. (2018). Problem-based learning: Generates higher-order thinking skills of tenth graders in ecosystem concept. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 4(1), 29–34.
Rofi’uddin, A. (2000). Model pendidikan berpikir kritis-kreatif untuk siswa sekolah dasar. Majalah Bahasa Dan Seni, 28(1), 72–94.
Rofiah, E., Aminah, N. S., & Ekawati, E. Y. (2013). Penyusunan instrumen tes kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi Fisika pada siswa SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 1(2), 17–22. Retrieved from https://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/pfisika/article/view/2797/1913
Rukmini, D., & Saputri, L. A. D. E. (2017). The authentic assessment to measure students’ English productive skills based on 2013 Curriculum. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i2.8128
Setiawati, W., Asmira, O., Ariyana, Y., Bestary, R., & Pudjiastuti, A. (2018). Buku penilaian berorientasi higher order thinking skills. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan-Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Sinaga, M., Charlina, C., Septyanti, E., & Pertiwi, T. Y. A. (2018). Modesty in learning teacher of 3rd state school Sinaboi District at Rokan Hilir Regency. In Proceeding of the 2nd URICES (pp. 978–979). Pekanbaru: UNRI.
Suarimbawa, K. A., Marhaeni, A. A. I. N., & Suprianti, G. (2017). An analysis of authentic assessment implementation based on curriculum 2013 in SMP Negeri 4 Singaraja. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 1(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v1i1.9551
Sunaryo, Y. (2013). Model Pembelajaran berbasis masalah untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis dan kreatif matematik siswa SMA di Kota Tasikmalaya. Universitas Terbuka.
Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook. Bloomington, Indiana: Center for Innovation in Teaching the The Handicappaed & Indiana University. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED090725.pdf
Tjipto, S. (2013). Lesson study sebagai inovasi pendidikan. Solo: Kafilah Pubishing.
Tofade, T., Elsner, J., & Haines, S. T. (2013). Best practice strategies for effective use of questions as a teaching tool. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(7), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe777155
Triani, L., Wahyuni, S., Purwanti, E., Hudha, A. M., Fatmawati, D., & Husamah, H. (2018). Pembelajaran I-CARE berbantuan praktikum: Peningkatan problem-solving skills dan hasil belajar siswa pada materi jaringan hewan. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 4(2), 158–168. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v4i2.21826
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
