Analysis of the Difference between INA-CBG Rates and Hospital Rates for Outpatient and Inpatient Services at FKRTL Provider BPJS Kesehatan Mataram City

Authors

  • Putu Gede Wawan Swandayana Master of Health Administration Study Program, Faculty of Health, Universitas Qamarul Huda Badaruddin Bagu, Jl. H. Badaruddin Bagu 83562
  • Sastrawan Sastrawan Master of Health Administration Study Program, Faculty of Health, Universitas Qamarul Huda Badaruddin Bagu, Jl. H. Badaruddin Bagu 83562

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v9i2.4350

Keywords:

rates difference, health services, outpatient and inpatient

Abstract

The National Health Insurance Program or Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional (JKN) managed by the Health Social Security Administration Agency or Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial Kesehatan (BPJS Kesehatan) has entered its eighth year of implementation. Since 2014, PT Askes (Persero) has transformed into BPJS Kesehatan, this also has an impact on changes in the payment system from Retrospective Payment System to Prospective Payment System with INA-CBG (Indonesian-Case Based Groups) rates. The difference between INA-CBG rates and hospital real rates is a fundamental problem, so hospitals must make efforts to achieve quality control and cost control. The real rate is the rate used by the hospital based on service of each service according to local regulations. Meanwhile, INA-CBG is a case-based health financing package by grouping various types of services into one unit. There is a difference between the INA-CBG rates and the hospital's real rates for paying JKN claims for Advanced Inpatient (RITL) and Advanced Outpatient (RJTL) services as a whole. This study is a descriptive-analytic quantitative research. The data used is secondary data obtained from the list of hospital JKN claims on the BPJS Kesehatan Claims Digital Verification application. The results of the study indicate that there is a negative difference between the total INA-CBG rate and the total hospital real rate for inpatient services of Rp. -25,654,787,895 or -36% of the INA-CBG rate. In outpatient services there is a negative difference of Rp. -6,144,370,328,- or -13% of the INA-CBG rate. Based on these findings, we recommend that hospitals should conduct a utilization review of health services, as well as calculate the appropriate unit cost for each type of service. The hospital carries out quality control of services by paying attention to the diagnosis and action and treatment provided, so that there are no unnecessary services.

References

Depkes, RI. (2014). Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 27 Tahun 2014 Tentang Petunjuk Teknis Sistem Indonesian Case Base Groups (INA-CBGs). 50.

Dumaris, H.(2015). Analisis Perbedaan Tarif Rumah Sakit Dan Tarif INA-CBG ’ s Pelayanan Rawat Jalan Di RSUD Budhi Asih Jakarta Tahun 2015. Jurnal Administrasi Rumah Sakit 3(1), 20–28.

Handayani, L., Suharmiati., & Niniek L., P. (2019). Unit Cost Rumah Sakit Dan Tarif Ina-Cbgs, Buletin Penelitian Sistem Kesehatan 21(4), 21–27.

Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. (2016). Indonesian Case Based Groups (INA-CBG’s) Dan Non Indonesian Case Based. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 52 Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Tarif Pelayanan Kesehatan Dalam Penyelenggaraan Program Jaminan Kesehatan.

Kementrian Kesehatan RI. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 76 Tahun 2016 Tentang Pedoman Indonesian Case Base Group (INA-CBG). 2016.†(92): 1–63. http://perhati-kl.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/PMK-No-76-2016.pdf.

Budiarto, W., & Sugiharto, M. (2013). Biaya Klaim Ina Cbgs Dan Biaya Riil Penyakit Katastropik Rawat Inap Peserta Jamkesmas Di Rumah Sakit Studi Di 10 Rumah Sakit Milik Kementerian Kesehatan Januari–Maret 2012. Buletin Penelitian Sistem Kesehatan, 16(1 Jan). doi:10.22435/bpsk.v16i1 Jan.3146.

Lilissuriani., Saputra, I., & Ruby, M. (2017). Perbedaan Biaya Riil Rumah Sakit Dan Rarif INA-CBG Untuk Kasus Katastropik Dengan Penyakit Jantung Koroner Pada Pasien Rawat Inap Peserta Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional Di RSUZA. Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat 3(1): 198–205.

Munawaroh, S, Sulistiadi, W., & Rachmad. (2019). Perbedaan Tarif INA–CBG’s Dengan Tarif Riil Rumah Sakit Pada Pasien BPJS Kasus Stroke Iskemik Rawat Inap Kelas I Di RS PON Tahun 2018. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Administrasi Rumah Sakit Indonesia (MARSI) 3(2): 155–65. http://ejournal.urindo.ac.id/index.php/MARSI/article/view/532.

Salim, D., L., F. (2020). Aksesibilitas Pembiayaan Kesehatan Dalam Program Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional. Lex Et Societatis 8(4): 104–14.

Fadlilah, S., Sucipto, A., Rahil, N. H., & Sumarni, S. (2020). Daun Sirsak (Annona Muricata L.) Efektif Menurunkan Kadar Gula Darah. Media Kesehatan Masyarakat Indonesia, 16(1), 15-25. Retrieved from https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/mkmi/article/view/8864.

Wibowo, B. (2014). Tarif Ina – CBG Untuk JKN 2014. Case Mix Indonesia (27): 41

Downloads

Published

2021-12-30

How to Cite

Swandayana, P. G. W., & Sastrawan, S. (2021). Analysis of the Difference between INA-CBG Rates and Hospital Rates for Outpatient and Inpatient Services at FKRTL Provider BPJS Kesehatan Mataram City. Prisma Sains : Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 9(2), 246–252. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v9i2.4350

Issue

Section

Research Articles