The Effectiveness of the Entrepreneurship MBKM Lecture Model: Alternatives to Improve Student Creativity Competencies during the Pandemic Covid-19
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v10i2.4993Keywords:
Entrepreneurship MBKM model, business plan, startup, PkM proposal, creativityAbstract
This study aims to produce an effective Entrepreneurship MBKM model in increasing student creativity by producing lecture outputs by students in the form of business plan drafts, startups, and entrepreneurship PkM proposals. The MBKM Entrepreneurship model used is said to be effective if there is an increase in creativity competence and it produces lecture outputs by students which are statistically significant and the average n-gain is at least in the moderate category. The research design in this study used a pre-experiment with a one group pre-test and post-test design. The research subjects were 30 students of Unesa physics in the 2021/2022 academic year. The instrument used in this research is a creativity assessment to assess student portfolio results. Data were analyzed using paired t-test and N-gain to see the increase in creativity. The results showed that there was a difference in creativity before and after the model was applied and a significant increase in student creativity and the average N-gain increase in student creativity in the medium criteria. In addition, students are able to produce creative products in the form of business plan drafts, startups, and entrepreneurship PkM proposals with a minimum score of B+.References
Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to teach. New York: Mc. Graw-Hill.
Chin, M. K. & Siew, N. M. (2015). The development and validation of a figural scientific creativity test for preschool pupils. Creative Education, 6 (1), 1391-1402.
Cruz, J. P. C. D. (2015). Development of an experimental science module to improve middle school students’ integrated science process skills. Proceedings of the DLSU Research Congress, 3, 1-6.
Daud, A. M., Omar, J., Turiman, P., & Osman, K. (2012). Creativity in science education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 467- 474.
Dwikoranto, Madlazim, Erman. (2018). Project Based Laboratory Learning As An Alternative Learning Model To Improve Sciences Process Skills And Creativity Of Physic Teacher Candidate. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1387 (2018) 012074. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1387/1/012074
Dwikoranto, Munasir, R Setiani, Suyitno, W A Surasmi, S Tresnaningsih, Pramonoadi. (2020). Effectiveness of Project Based Laboratory Learning to Increase Student’s Science Process Skills and Creativity. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1491 (2020) 012006. doi:10.1088/1742-596/1491/1/012006
Escarti, A., Wright, P. M., Pascual, C., & Gutierrez, M. (2015). Tool for assessing responsibility-based education (Tare) 2.0: Instrument revisions, inter-rater reliability, and correlations between observed teaching strategies and student behaviors. Universal Journal of Psychology, 3 (2), 55-63.
Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (8th edt.). New York: McGram-Hill Companies Inc.
Fraenkel, Jack. R., and Norman E. Wallen. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education 8th Edition. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Griffin, J., (2016). Customer Loyalty, Menumbuhkan dan Mempertahankan Kesetiaan Pelanggan. Alih Bahasa Dwi Kartini Yahya. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Griffin, P., & Care, E. (2015). Assesment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills: Methods and Approach. New York: Springer.
Jatmiko, B., Prahani, B.K., Munasir, Supardi, Z.A.I., Wicaksono, I., Erlina, N., Pandiangan, P., Althaf, R., and Zainuddin. (2018). The comparison of OR-IPA teaching model and problem based learning model effectiveness to improve critical thinking skills of pre-service physics teachers. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(2), 1-22.
Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2014). Models of teaching, eight edition. New York: Pearson Education Inc.
Mc Clelland, David. C. (2012). Human Motivation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nurcahyo, Wisnu., Widaryana, I.K., Rahardian, Dadan. (2012). Program Riset Keilmuan. Direktorat Sumber Daya Dirjen Riset dan Teknologi. Kemendikbudristek. Jakarta.
Plomp, & N. Nieveen. (2013). (Eds.), Educational design research – Part B: Illustrative cases (pp. 159-178). Enschede, the Netherlands: SLO.
Prahani, B.K., Suprapto, N., Suliyanah, Lestari, N.A., Jauhariyah, M.N.R, Admoko, S., and Wahyuni, S., (2018). The effectiveness of collaborative problem based physics learning (CPBPL) model to improve student’s self-confidence on physics learning. Journal Physics: Conference Series, 997(08), 1-6.
Rotteram, K. (2014). Teaching, learning and creativity model for science. SSR, 95 (1), 79-84.
Sunarti T., Wasis, Madlazim, Suyidno, and Prahani, B.K. (2018). The effectiveness of CPI model to improve positive attitude toward science (PATS) for pre-service physics teacher. Journal Physics: Conference Series, 997(13), 1-7.
Suyidno, Nur, M., Yuanita, L., Prahani, B.K., and Jatmiko, B. (2018). Effectiveness of creative responsibility based teaching (CRBT) model on basic physics learning to increase student’s scientific creativity and responsibility. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(1), 136-151.
Torrance, E. P. (2013). Scientific views of creativity and factors affecting its growth. The MIT Press and American Academy of Arts & Sciences are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Daedalus.
Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A. M., & Osman, K. (2012). Fostering the 21st century skills through scientific literacy and science process skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110-116.
Zulkarnaen, Supardi, Z.A.I., & Jatmiko, B. (2017). Feasibility of Creative Exploration, Creative Elaboration, Creative Modeling, Practice Scientific Creativity, Discussion, Reflection (C3PDR) Teaching Model to Improve Students’ Scientific Creativity of Junior High School. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(6), 1020-1034.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
