Development of Newton Gravity Student Worksheets on Problem-Based Learning Model to Improve Students' Scientific Argumentation Skills
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v10i3.5349Keywords:
Newton's Gravity, Scientific Argumentation Skills, Student WorksheetsAbstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity, practicability, and efficiency of student worksheets for improving students' scientific argumentation skills on the topic of Newton's Law of Gravity. This study was conducted using the 4-D method, which consists of four stages of research: define, design, develop, and disseminate. It is restricted to the development stage in this study. The validity of the student worksheets was analysed based on aspects of content feasibility, guidelines, questions, scientific argumentation skills, and the Problem Based Learning model achieved an overall percentage of 93.75 %, 100 %, and 95.83 % respectively. 100 %, 100 %, 100 %. The practical aspect of student worksheets is analyzed based on the students' feedback in terms of the student worksheets component, Problem Based Learning model, enthusiasm, Newton's Law of Gravity topic, and scientific argumentation, with an average of 86 %, 82 %, 91.5 %, 88.5 %, and 88 % with robust criteria, respectively. The effectiveness of the student worksheets was determined using the outcomes of the scientific argumentation test's pretest and posttest, and they met the criteria for being very effective. The given test received an average n-gain score of 0.7342 in the interpretation category. Based on the research findings of the data analysis for validity, practicability, and effectiveness, it is possible to conclude that the student worksheets developed are feasible and effective in improving students' argumentation skills. Student worksheets based on a similar Problem Based Learning model could be designed to improve students' argumentation skills on other physics topics.References
Andriyatin, R., Rosidin, U., & Suana, W. (2019). PENGEMBANGAN LEMBAR KERJA SISWA MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING MATERI SUHU DAN KALOR. 1, 39–50.
Barlenti, I., Hasan, M., & Mahidin, D. (2017). Pengembangan Lks Berbasis Project Based Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 05(01), 81–86.
Devy, H. C., Puspitawati, R. P., & Yakub, P. (2020). Validitas dan Efektivitas LKPD Pendekatan Toulmin’s Argument Pattern untuk Melatih Keterampilan Argumentasi. Bioedukasi: Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi, 9(1), 80–87.
Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915–933. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20012
Falah, S. (2017). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Siswa Listrik Dinamis Berbasis Poe (Predict-Observe-Explain) Untuk Meningkatkan Penalaran Dan Pemahaman Konsep Siswa. UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal, 6(2), 96–102.
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
Hasanah, T. A. N., Huda, C., & Kurniawati, M. (2017). Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Problem Based Learning (PBL) pada Materi Gelombang Bunyi untuk Siswa SMA Kelas XII. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 1(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v1i1.1631
Kurniasari, I. S., & Setyarsih, W. (2017). Penerapan model pembelajaran argument driven inquiry (ADI) untuk melatihkan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa pada materi usaha dan energi. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika (JIPF), 6(3), 171–174.
Lazarou, D. (2009). Learning to Tap: An Effort to Scaffold Students Argumentation in Science. January.
Niki Bagus S, M. W., Admoko, S., & Niki Bagus Wahyune Sukma, M. (2020). Trend To Apply Toulmin Argument Pattern (Tap) To Learning Physics in the Ability To Practice the Argument and Understanding Concepts. 09(02), 276–284.
Noviyani, M., Kusairi, S., & Amin, M. (2017). Penguasaan Konsep dan Kemampuan Berargumentasi Siswa SMP pada Pembelajaran IPA dengan Inkuiri Berbasis Argumen. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 2(7), 974–978.
OECD. (2015). PISA 2015 Framework. Oecd, March 2015, 52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146512469014
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): Vol. I. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science, 328(5977), 463–466. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183944
Putri, D., & Mitarlis. (2015). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Siswa Berbasis Mind Mapping pada Materi Laju Reaksi Untuk Melatihkan Keterampilan Berfikir Kreatif Siswa Kelas XI SMA. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 4(2), 340–348.
Rachmanita Murniati dan Gusti Made Sanjaya, D. I. (2013). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Kimia Berbasis Blended Learning Di Sma Negeri 7 Kediri Development of Chemistry Learning Kit Based on Blended Learning At Sma Negeri 7 Kediri. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 2(3), 133–137.
Riduwan. 2008. Skala Pengukuran Variabel-variabel Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Syerliana, L., Muslim, & Setiawan, W. (2018). Argumentation skill profile using “toulmin Argumentation Pattern†analysis of high school student at Subang on topic hydrostatic pressure (A. S., M. R., K. D., J. A., R. L., R. R., H. L., Y. K., Wiji, S. A., & N. E. (eds.); Vol. 1013, Issue 1). Institute of Physics Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012031
Thiagarajan, Semmel S.S., & S. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook. Journal of School Psychology, 14(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4405(76)90066-2
Toulmin, S.E. 2003. The Uses of Argument. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Viyanti, V., Cari, C., Sunarno, W., & Kun Prasetyo, Z. (2016). Pemberdayaan Keterampilan Argumentasi Mendorong Pemahaman Konsep Siswa. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 7(1), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v7i1.1152
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
