Developing Iranian EFL Learners’ Grammatical Knowledge: Insights from Spaced versus Massed Instruction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i2.10296Keywords:
Grammar learning, Massed instruction, Pre-intermediate EFL learners, Spaced instructionAbstract
Despite grammar receiving greater emphasis than other language skills in Iranian schools, Iranian EFL students encounter challenges in acquiring the linguistic structures they are exposed to, resulting in insufficient grammar knowledge. This experiment looked into the effects of spaced versus massed instruction on learning modal auxiliaries among Iranian EFL learners with a lower-intermediate command of English. To this end, through an Oxford Quick Placement Tests (OQPT), 78 lower-intermediate learners were selected and assigned in three conditions, with 26 subjects in each: Spaced condition, Massed condition, Control condition. Using a Levene’s test, it was shown that the subjects were homogenous prior to the experiment. Then, a pretest was used. The results of the pretest showed that there was no between groups’ difference prior to the treatment. Afterward, the spaced group received three 30-minute sessions on modal auxiliaries based on Fundamentals of English Grammar by Azar (2016), while the massed condition received the instruction in just a single 90-minute session. The subjects in all conditions were then posttested. The results of a one-way between groups analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that both treatment groups outperformed the comparison group (p < .05) with a large effect size (eta squared = .63). The results of post-hoc analyzes using Bonferroni adjustment further revealed that there was a statistically significant difference between the two experimental conditions (p < .05). That is, the spaced subjects gained more compared to their massed counterparts with regard to the targeted L2 form. Pedagogically, this study suggests ESL/EFL instructors could integrate spaced instruction strategies for enhancing students' proficiency in modals. Material developers may also leverage these findings to create more engaging and effective instructional materials.
References
Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1972). Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall. Psychological Review, 79(2), 97.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C, Sorensen, C.K, & Walker, D. (2019). Introduction to research in education. (10th ed).Wadsworth/Cengage Learning.
Azar, B. S. (2016). Fundamentals of English grammar. Prentice Hall.
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford University Press.
Baddeley, A. D. (1990). The development of the concept of working memory: Implications and contributions of neuropsychology. In G. Vallar & T. Shallice (Eds.), Neuropsychological impairments of short-term memory (pp. 54–73). Cambridge University Press.
Baddeley, A. D., & Longman, D. J. A. (1978). The influence of length and frequency of training session on the rate of learning to type. Ergonomics, 21(8), 627-635.
Bahrick, H. P., & Hall, L. K. (2005). The importance of retrieval failures to long-term retention: A metacognitive explanation of the spacing effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(4), 566-577.
Balota, D. A., Duchek, J. M., & Paullin, R. (1989). Age-related differences in the impact of spacing, lag, and retention interval. Psychology and Aging, 4(1), 3.
Bird, S. (2010). Effects of distributed practice on the acquisition of L2 English syntax. Applied Psycholinguistics 31(4), 635-650.
Bloom, K. C., & Shuell, T. J. (1981). Effects of massed and distributed practice on the learning and retention of second-language vocabulary. The Journal of Educational Research, 74(4), 245-248.
Carpenter, S. K., Cepeda, N. J., Rohrer, D., Kang, S. H., & Pashler, H. (2012). Using spacing to enhance diverse forms of learning: Review of recent research and implications for instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 24(3), 369-378.
Carpenter, S. K., Pan, S. C., & Butler, A. C. (2022). The science of effective learning with spacing and retrieval practice. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(9), 496-511.
Cepeda, N. J., Coburn, N., Rohrer, D., Wixted, J. T., Mozer, M. C., & Pashler, H. (2009). Optimizing distributed practice: theoretical analysis and practical implications. Experimental psychology, 56(4), 236.
Challis, B. H. (1993). Spacing effects on cued-memory tests depend on level of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(2), 389.
Collins, L., & White, J. (2011). An intensive look at intensity and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 106-133.
Cuddy, L. J., & Jacoby, L. L. (1982). When forgetting helps memory: An analysis of repetition effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21(4), 451-467.
DeKeyser, R. (2007). Skill acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 97–113). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dempster, F. N. (1988). The spacing effect: A case study in the failure to apply the results of psychological research. American Psychologist, 43(8), 627.
EBBINGHAUS, H. (1885). 1885: Memory: a contribution to experimental psychology. Über das Gedächtnis: Untersuchungen zur experimentellen Psychologie.
Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 83-107.
Ellis, R. (2012). Language teaching research and language pedagogy. John Wiley & Sons.
Etemadfar, P., Namaziandost, E., & Banari, R. (2019). The impact of different output-based task repetition conditions on producing speech acts among Iranian advanced EFL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(12), 1541-1549.
Glenberg, A. M. (1979). Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition. Memory & Cognition, 7(2), 95-112.
Godden, D. R., & Baddeley, A. D. (1975). Contextâ€dependent memory in two natural environments: On land and underwater. British Journal of Psychology, 66(3), 325-331.
Gordon, K. R. (2020). The advantages of retrieval-based and spaced practice: Implications for word learning in clinical and educational contexts. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 51(4), 955-965.
Grimaldi, P. J., & Karpicke, J. D. (2012). When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding?. Memory & Cognition, 40(4), 505-513.
Hamouda, A. (2021). An Investigation of the Effects of Spaced Versus Massed Practice on Saudi EFL Learners' Vocabulary Learning. Language in India, 21(2).
Hintzman, D. L. (1976). Repetition and memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 10, 47-91.
Hosseini, E. Z., Nasri, M., & Afghari, A. (2017). Looking beyond teachers’ classroom behavior: novice and experienced EFL teachers’ practice of pedagogical Knowledge to Improve Learners’ Motivational Strategies. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(8), 183-200.
Jacoby, L. L. (1978). On interpreting the effects of repetition: Solving a problem versus remembering a solution. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17(6), 649-667.
Kapler, I. V., Weston, T., & Wiseheart, M. (2015). Spacing in a simulated undergraduate classroom: Long-term benefits for factual and higher-level learning. Learning and Instruction, 36, 38-45.
Kargar Behbahani, H., & Khademi, A. (2022). The concurrent contribution of input flooding, visual input enhancement, and consciousness-raising tasks to noticing and intake of present perfect tense. MEXTESOL Journal, 46(4), n4.
Kargar Behbahani, H., & Kooti, M. S. (2022). Long-term effects of pictorial Cues, spaced retrieval, and output-based activities on vocabulary learning: The case of Iranian learners. Global Academic Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 4.
Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger III, H. L. (2007). Expanding retrieval practice promotes short-term retention, but equally spaced retrieval enhances long-term retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(4), 704.
Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger III, H. L. (2008). The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science, 319(5865), 966-968.
Karpicke, J. D., & Bauernschmidt, A. (2011). Spaced retrieval: absolute spacing enhances learning regardless of relative spacing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(5), 1250.
Kim, S. K., & Webb, S. (2022). The effects of spaced practice on second language learning: A metaâ€analysis. Language Learning, 72(1), 269-319.
Koval, N. G. (2019). Testing the deficient processing account of the spacing effect in second language vocabulary learning: Evidence from eye tracking. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(5), 1103-1139.
Landauer, T. K. (1969). Reinforcement as consolidation. Psychological Review, 76(1), 82.
Lee, E., & Choe, M.-H. (2014). The effect of spaced repetitions on Korean elementary students’ L2 English vocabulary learning. Studies in English Education, 19 (1), 55–75.
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2015). Second language research: Methodology and design. Routledge.
Mashhadi, A., Taghi Farvardin, M., & Mozaffari, A. (2017). Effects of spaced and massed distribution instruction on EFL learners' recall and retention of grammatical structures. Teaching English Language, 11(2), 57-75.
Melton, A. W. (1970). The situation with respect to the spacing of repetitions and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9(5), 596-606.
Miles. S. (2010). Good timing: the spacing effect and grammar acquisition. English Teaching, 65(2), 131-150.
Miles, S. (2014). Spaced vs. massed distribution instruction for L2 grammar learning. System, 42, 412-428.
Miles, S., & Kwon, C. J. (2008). Benefits of using CALL vocabulary programs to provide systematic word recycling. English Teaching (ì˜ì–´êµìœ¡), 63(1), 199-216.
Nakata, T. (2015). Effects of expanding and equal spacing on second language vocabulary learning: Does gradually increasing spacing increase vocabulary learning? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(4), 677-711.
Nakata, T., & Elgort, I. (2021). Effects of spacing on contextual vocabulary learning: Spacing facilitates the acquisition of explicit, but not tacit, vocabulary knowledge. Second Language Research, 37(2), 233-260.
Nakata, T., Suzuki, Y., & He, X. (2023). Costs and Benefits of Spacing for Second Language Vocabulary Learning: Does Relearning Override the Positive and Negative Effects of Spacing?. Language Learning, 73(3), 799-834.
Namaziandost, E., Rahimi Esfahani, F., & Hashemifardnia, A. (2018). The comparative effect of spacing instruction and massed instruction on intermediate EFL learners’ reading comprehension. Sage Open, 8(4), 2158244018811024.
Namaziandost, E., Nasri, M., Rahimi Esfahani, F., & Keshmirshekan, M. H. (2019a). The impacts of spaced and massed distribution instruction on EFL learners’ vocabulary learning. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1661131.
Namaziandost, E., Nasri, M., & Rahimi Esfahani, F. (2019b). Texts with various levels of hardness, reading comprehension and reading motivation: I+1 versus i-1. ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching, 8 (1), 60–77.
Namaziandost, E., Mohammed Sawalmeh, M. H., & Izadpanah Soltanabadi, M. (2020a). The effects of spaced versus massed distribution instruction on EFL learners’ vocabulary recall and retention. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1792261.
Namaziandost, E., Anwar, C., & Neisi, L. (2020b). Comparing the impact of spaced instruction and massed instruction in learning collocations among Iranian EFL learners. EduLite: Journal of English Education, Literature and Culture, 5(1), 55-65.
Pavlik Jr, P. I., & Anderson, J. R. (2005). Practice and forgetting effects on vocabulary memory: An activationâ€based model of the spacing effect. Cognitive Science, 29(4), 559-586.
Pimsleur, P. (1967). A memory schedule. The Modern Language Journal, 51(2), 73-75.
Roediger III, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006a). The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(3), 181-210.
Roediger III, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006b). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249-255.
Rogers, J. (2023). Spacing effects in task repetition research. Language Learning, 73(2), 445-474.
Rogers, J., & Cheung, A. (2020). Input spacing and the learning of L2 vocabulary in a classroom context. Language Teaching Research, 24(5), 616-641.
Rogers, J., & Cheung, A. (2021). Does it matter when you review?: Input spacing, ecological validity, and the learning of L2 vocabulary. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(5), 1138-1156.
Rohrer, D., & Pashler, H. (2007). Increasing retention without increasing study time. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(4), 183-186.
Segalowitz, N. (2010). Cognitive Bases of Second Language Fluency. Routledge.
Serrano, R. (2012). Is intensive learning effective? Reflecting on the results from cognitive psychology and the second language acquisition literature. In C. Munoz (Ed.), Intensive exposure experiences in second language learning (pp. 3–22). Multilingual Matters.
Seabrook, R., Brown, G. D., & Solity, J. E. (2005). Distributed and massed practice: From laboratory to classroom. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(1), 107-122.
Snoder, P. (2017). Improving English Learners' productive collocation knowledge: The effects of involvement load, spacing, and intentionality. TESL Canada Journal, 34(3), 140-164.
Stoltzfus, M., & Sukseemuang, P. (2018). Distribution of instructional time in secondary, non-intensive Thai EFL classes: Effects on grammar acquisition. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 15(2).
Suzuki, Y., & Hanzawa, K. (2022). Massed task repetition is a double-edged sword for fluency development: An EFL classroom study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44(2), 536-561.
Thios, S. J., & D'Agostino, P. R. (1976). Effects of repetition as a function of study-phase retrieval. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15(5), 529-536.
Torkabad, M. G., & Fazilatfar, A. M. (2014). Textual enhancement and input processing effects on the intake of present and past simple tenses. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 562-571.
Wojcik, E. H. (2013). Remembering new words: Integrating early memory development into word learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 151.
Yan, T., & Zhou, D. (2023). The influence of the spacing effect on L2 vocabulary learning: A study on Chinese university students. System, 115, 103049.
Zhang, R., Zou, D., & Xie, H. (2022). Spaced repetition for authentic mobile-assisted word learning: Nature, learner perceptions, and factors leading to positive perceptions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9), 2593-2626.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Â
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
- Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
