Philippine and South African Experiences on Folk Literature Research: Relevance, Gains, and Challenges

Authors

  • Connie Makgabo Faculty of Education, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa, South Africa
  • Genevieve J Quintero University of the Philippines, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i2.10667

Keywords:

Folklore, Indigenous cultures, Oral traditions, Philippine folklore, South African folklore,

Abstract

Folkloric studies have accelerated in the Philippines and South Africa because the Academe acknowledged the urgency to collect, preserve, and publish the oral traditions of indigenous communities. Oral traditions embody the history, values, and world views of these indigenous cultures, which need to be preserved for posterity. This paper discusses the relevance, gains, and challenges in conducting folklore research in the Philippines and South Africa, which share similarities, including their colonial pasts and number of indigenous communities. The paper contemplates the relevance of folklore research outputs in different fields thereby contributing to the discourse on the value of folklore research. This qualitative study uses textual analysis to focus on insights related to folklore research, using secondary data including journal articles, book publications, and textual references. The study reveals that although there is extensive research in the field of folklore in both countries, there remain gaps that need to be filled, such as the collection, preservation, and recognition of representative folklore from other regions and cultural communities. South Africa, for instance, has 12 official languages, and the Philippines has 110 ethnolinguistic groups. There are still languages and indigenous oral traditions that are developing, and folk literature that needs to be recorded, preserved, and published. These oral traditions/folk literature play an important role in revealing people’s cultural identities and preserving heritage, which is imperative in nation-building. The findings highlight the importance of continuing research about folklore and the need to preserve indigenous knowledge systems When written down and published, folklore becomes tangible and preserved for posterity, providing present and future generations the opportunity to learn, understand, and appreciate their cultural legacy.

Author Biographies

Connie Makgabo, Faculty of Education, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa

Faculty of Education, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa

Genevieve J Quintero, University of the Philippines

Cultural Studies Professor, Faculty of Humanities, University of the Philippines, Philippines

References

Alburo, E. K. (1992). Continuing and emerging directions in contemporary Philippine folklore studies. Philippine Quarterly of Culture and Society, 20(2/3), 210-225.

Agung, A. S. S. N., Suryaman, M., & Sayuti, S. A. (2024). A viewpoint on folklore education: providing students freedom and empowerment. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 18(1), 63-71

Boven, K., & Morohashi, J. (2002). Best practices using indigenous knowledge (pp. 12-13). The Hague: Nuffic.

Clark, J. (2020), Maximo D. Ramos | The Dean Of Philippine Lower Mythology. The Aswang Project. https://www.aswangproject.com/books-references-philippine-mythology-folklore/

Demetrio,F. R. (1970). Dictionary of Philippine folk beliefs and customs, Volume 1. Cincinnati: Xavier University.

Diko, M. (2023). A sociological perspective on making South African tourism monumental through folklore. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 12(1), 212-219.

Doerner, J., Kondi, Y., Lee, E. & Shelat, A., (2019), May. Threshold ECDSA from ECDSA assumptions: The multiparty case. In 2019 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) (pp. 1051-1066). IEEE.

Dorson, R. M., & Dorson, R. M. (1972). African folklore (pp. 41-42). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Dundes, A. (1965). The study of folklore. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Eugenio, D. L. (1987). Folklore in Philippine schools. Philippine Studies, 35(2), 175-190.

Eugenio, D. (Ed.) (1995). ASEAN folk literature: An anthology. Manila: ASEAN Committee on Culture and Information.

Fernandez, M. E. (1994) Gender and indigenous knowledge. Indigenous Knowledge & Development Monitor, 2, 6-7.

Hornedo, F. H. (1980). Reviewed work: Myths and symbols, Philippines, 28(2), 228-231.

https://www.aswangproject.com/maximo-d-ramos/)

Jiyana, M. W. (2022). The role of traditional storytelling in the teaching and learning of isiNdebele in Grade 3 (Doctoral thesis, University of Pretoria).

Joubert, A. (2015). Ethnography from the Mission Field: The Hoffmann Collection of Cultural Knowledge. Leiden: Brill.

Kgobe, D.M.(1988). Phukubje le tshwene le dinonwane tse dingwe Johannesburg : Book Studio

Kgopa, M. (1998). Northern Sotho legends and historical narratives: Similarities and differences. (Master’s dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand).

Kgopa, M., & Mathe, D. (2021). Sociocultural themes in selected Northern Sotho fables: The motif–index perspective. Southern African Journal for Folklore Studies, 31(1), 1-20.

Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. (1998). Destination culture: Tourism, museums, and heritage (Volume 10). Oakland: University of California Press.

Król, K., Hernia, J., Prus, B., & Szylar, M. (2022). The need to preserve cultural heritage. In J. Hernik, M. Walczycka, E. Sankowski, & B. J. Harris (Eds.) Cultural Heritage—Possibilities for Land-Centered Societal Development (pp. 1-14). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58092-6

Lemekoana, J.M., (1988). TÅ¡a borena

Lester, J. (1969). Keep on stepping. Black Folktales, 153-157.

Mabuya, L.T.L. & Khath, N.P. (1986). Nokana ye e šutšago. Pretoria: Errol Marx.

Madigan, F. C. (1996). In memoriam: Francisco Radaza Demetrio, 1920-1996. Asian Folklore Studies, 55(2), 399+. Gale Academic OneFile. link.gale.com/apps/doc/A19175850/AONE?u=anon~9d64eb01&sid=sitemap&xid=521018

Makgamatha, P. M. (1990). Keleketla. Johannesburg: Educum Publishers.

Makgopa, M., Mapaya, M., & Thobejane, T. (2012). Infusion of folklore into the South African jazz: An analysis. Southern African Journal for Folklore Studies, 22(2), 119-128.

Makopo, S.A. (1990). Moepathutse. Pretoria. Actua Press.

Manuel, E. A. (1963). A survey of Philippine folk epics. Asian Folklore Studies, 22, 1-76.

Manuel, E.A. (1980). Philippine oral traditions: Theory and practice. Philippine Quarterly of Culture and Society, 8(1).7-27.

Manuel, P. (1985). The anticipated bass in Cuban popular music. Latin American Music Review/Revista De Música Latinoamericana, 6(2), 249-261.

Mashige, M. C. (2002). Cultural identity and folktales in the new millennium. Southern African Journal for Folklore Studies, 12(2), 50-62.

Mongokoane, M.J.(1975). Sekolo sa borakgolokhukhu, Educum.

MonkeyLearn. (2023). The practical guide to textual analysis. MonkeyLearn.

Msimang, C. T. (1990). Syntagmatic versus paradigmatic structural analysis of Zulu folktales, South African Journal of African Languages, 10(4), 307-313.

Nsamenang, A. B. (2011). The culturalization of developmental trajectories. In L. A. Jensen, bridging cultural and developmental approaches to psychology: New syntheses in theory, research, and policy (p. 235). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ong, W.J., (1984). Orality, literacy, and medieval textualization. New literary history, 16(1), pp.1-12.

Quintero, G. J., & Nabayra, E. S. (2018). The Mandaya Dawot. Manila: National Commission for Culture and the Arts.

Ramos, M. D. (1971). The Aswang Syncrasy in Philippine folklore: With illustrative accounts in vernacular texts and translations. Quezon City: Philippine Folklore Society.

“Research in Folklore Studies.†Library Research Guide for Folklore and Mythology. Harvard Library. Retrieved 24 February 2024. https://guides.library.harvard.edu/folk_and_myth#:~:text=Folklore%20helps%20us%2 0understand%20society,are%20rarely%20ever%20just%20folklorists.

Schwartz-Shea, P., & Yanow, D. (2020). Interpretivism. SAGE Publications Ltd.

Senanayake, S. G. J. N. (2006). Indigenous knowledge as a key to sustainable development. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 1(1).

Serudu, S. M. (1990). Dipheko tsÌŒa Bagologolo: DingwalotsÌŒhaba tsÌŒa Sesotho sa Leboa. Pretoria: Kagiso Publishers.

Seymour-Smith, C. (1986). Opler, Marvin Kaufmann (1914-81). In: Macmillan Dictionary of Anthropology. Dictionary Series, (p. 212). London: Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08037-3_15

Sicat, G. P. (2014). Damiana Eugenio, master compiler of Philippine folkloric myths, legends, riddles, and proverbs. Per SE. https://econ.upd.edu.ph/perse/?p=4231

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2010). Fast facts: Indigenous peoples of the Philippines. UNDP Philippines. Retrieved 20 April 2018, from http://www.ph.undp.org/content/philippines/en/home/library/democratic_governance/FastFacts-IPs.html

Yang, W., & Lin, Y. (2021). Research on the interactive operations research model of e-commerce tourism resources business based on big data and circular economy concept. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 35(4), 1348-1373. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-12-2020-0520

Downloads

Published

2024-04-22

How to Cite

Makgabo, C., & Quintero, G. J. (2024). Philippine and South African Experiences on Folk Literature Research: Relevance, Gains, and Challenges. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 12(2), 985–995. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i2.10667

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2024)

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  1. They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  2. The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  3. That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  4. That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  5. They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  6. They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.

Copyright
Authors who publish with JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Licensing for Data Publication

JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching uses a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.