Gender Representation in Directive Speech Acts of Teachers: A Study on Indonesian Language Learning in Automotive Vocational High Schools in Pasaman District

Authors

  • Ade Darma Putra Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
  • Tressyalina Tressyalina Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i2.9762

Keywords:

Render representation, Directive speech acts, Indonesian language Learning

Abstract

This study aims to examine gender representation in directive speech acts of Indonesian language teachers in Pasaman Regency Automotive Department Vocational Schools. Included in the type of qualitative research, this research applies descriptive analysis method. The research data is in the form of directive speech of male teachers and female teachers in Indonesian language learning at SMK Department of Automotive Pasaman Regency. It can be concluded that Indonesian teachers use various forms of directive speech acts, such as directions, orders, and instructions to students. Variants of the use of directive speech acts also show variations between male and female teachers, with three dominant variants commonly used by male teachers and five variants commonly used by female teachers. The results also reveal that female teachers tend to use the speech act of ordering or commanding as the dominant form, although they also show a sense of solidarity by using the speech acts of suggesting and advising. On the other hand, male teachers are more inclined to the direct approach and commanding without preamble. This difference reflects the complexity of the relationship between men's and women's language and thinking in the learning context.

Author Biographies

Ade Darma Putra, Universitas Negeri Padang

Faculty of Language and Arts, Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia

Tressyalina Tressyalina, Universitas Negeri Padang

Faculty of Language and Arts, Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia

References

Adams, M. (2009). Power, politeness, and the pragmatics of Nicknames. Names, 57(2), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1179/175622709X436369

Andriana, M., Tressyalina, D., & Kunci, K. (2022). Kesantunan Berbahasa dalam Tindak Tutur Menyuruh Guru Bahasa Indonesia Berdasarkan Perspektif Gender dalam Proses Pembelajaran di SMP Negeri 3 Kampar Kiri Hulu Kabupaten Kampar. Jurnal Sastra Indonesia, 11(2), 129–138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/jsi.v11i2.55941

Beaver, D., & von Fintel, K. (2007). Semantics and Pragmatics - A New Journal. Semantics and Pragmatics, 0(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.0.1

Blum-Kulka, S. (1987). Indirectness and Politeness in Requests: Same or Different? Journal of Pragmatics, 11(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(87)90192-5

Cameron, D. (2020). Language and gender: Mainstreaming and the persistence of patriarchy. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2020(263), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2020-2078

Catalán, R. M. J. (2003). Sex Differences in L2 Vocabulary Learning Strategies. International Journal of Applied Linguistics (United Kingdom), 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/1473-4192.00037

Darwis, A. (2019). Tindak Tutur Direktif Guru Di Lingkungan SMP Negeri 19 Palu: Kajian Pragmatik. Bahasa Dan Sasta, 4(2), 1–10.

Diana, R. E., & Manaf, N. A. (2022). Prinsip Kesantunan Berbahasa dalam Tindak Tutur Direktif Guru Bahasa Indonesia pada Proses Pembelajaran di SMP. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(3), 4940–4952. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i3.2759

Ekawati, M. (2017). Kesantuanan Semu pada Tindak Tutur Ekspresif Marah dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Bahasa Dan Sastra, I(1), 55.

Elmita, W., Ermanto, & Ratna, E. (2013). Tindak Tutur Direktif Guru Dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar Di TK Nusa Indah Banuaran Padang. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 1(2), 139–147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24036/1301-019883

Hermaji, B. (2019). Teori Pragmatik. Magnum Pustaka Utama.

Juliano P, S. (2018). Komunikasi dan Gender: Perbandingan Gaya Komunikasi Dalam Budaya Maskulin dan Feminim. JIPSI - Jurnal Ilmu Politik Dan Komunikasi, 5(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.34010/jipsi.v5i01.153

Kuntjara, E. (2005). Membaca Posisi Wanita Melalui Bahasa: Deretan Temuan Penelitian Tanpa Implikasi Teoretis. Jurnal Masyarakat Dan Budaya, 2(2), 131–135. https://jmb.lipi.go.id/jmb/article/231

Mahsun. (2013). Metode Penilitian Bahasa.

Marizal, Y., R., S., & Tressyalina, T. (2021). Tindak Tutur Direktif Guru dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Di SMA Negeri 2 Gunung Talang. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 4(4), 441—452. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v4i4.264

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2009). Analisis Data Kualitatif: Buku Sumber Tentang Metode Metode Baru (T. Rohendi & M. Mulyarto (eds.)). Universitas Indonesia (UI-Press).

Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi: XXX). Remaja Rosdakarya.

Prayitno, H. J. (2009). Perilaku Tindak Tutur Berbahasa Pemimpin dalam Wacana Rapat Dinas: Kajian Pragmatik dengan Pendekatan Jender. Kajian Linguistik Dan Sastra, 21(2), 132–146. https://doi.org/10.23917/kls.v21i2.4382

Prayitno, H. J. (2010). Perwujudan Prinsip Kerjasama, Sopan Santun, dan Ironi Para Pejabat dalam Peristiwa Rapat Dinas di Lingkungan Pemkot Berbudaya Jawa. Kajian Linguistik Dan Sastra, 22(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/https://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/KLS/article/view/4364/

Prayitno, H. J., Ngalim, A., Sutopo, A., & Pangestu, D. W. (2019). Directive Politeness Act Strategy In The Discourse Of Education Column In National Newspaper As The Formation Of Studentsâ€TM Character In Indonesia. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(2), 349–362. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7241

Putri, F. R., Manaf, N. A., & Abdurahman. (2015). Kesantunan Berbahasa dalam Tindak Tutur Direktif Guru pada Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di SMA Negeri 15 Padang. Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra Dan Pembelajaran, 2(1), 88–98.

Richards, J. C. (2022). Exploring Emotions in Language Teaching. RELC Journal, 53(1), 225 –239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220927531

Sari, M., Rachman, H., Juli Astuti, N., Win Afgani, M., & Abdullah Siroj, R. (2022). Explanatory Survey dalam Metode Penelitian Deskriptif Kuantitatif. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Komputer, 3(01), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.47709/jpsk.v3i01.1953

Searle, J. R. (1976). A Classification of Illocutionary Acts. Language in Society, 5(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006837

Singh, A., Pakirnathan, P. G., & Suppiah, S. M. (2018). The Relationship between Perceived Teachers’ Self-disclosure and Out-of- classroom Communication among Malaysian Undergraduates in a Private Institution of Higher Learning. Asian Journal of University Education, 14(1), 38–57.

Sundoro, B. T. (2020). Penggunaan Alih Kode Pada Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Berperspektif Gender. Indonesian Language Education and Literature, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.24235/ileal.v6i1.6108

Syah, E. F. (2022). Representasi Tindak Tutur Ekspresif pada Podcast Mahasiswa UEU Sebagai Alternatif Bahan Ajar Bahasa Indonesia di SD. Jurnal Perseda : Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 4(3), 196–204. https://doi.org/10.37150/perseda.v4i3.1469

Thuruvan, P., & Yunus, M. M. (2017). The Speech Act of Request in the ESL Classroom. In 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature (Vol. 23, Issue 4, pp. 212–221). https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2017-2304-16

Towairesh, A. A. Bin. (2020). Language Ideologies and Saudi Society: Understanding the Notion of Diglossia. International Journal of English Linguistics, 10(4), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v10n4p90

Yulandari, Y. (2022). Politeness Strategies for Men on WhatsApp Social Media. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 6(2), 1684–1690. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v6i2.4341

Yuliana, R., Rohmadi, M., & Suhita, R. (2013). Daya Pragmatik Tindak Tutur Guru dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indnesia pada Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Basastra, 2(1), 1–14.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-22

How to Cite

Putra, A. D., & Tressyalina, T. (2024). Gender Representation in Directive Speech Acts of Teachers: A Study on Indonesian Language Learning in Automotive Vocational High Schools in Pasaman District. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 12(2), 1038–1047. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i2.9762

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2024)

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  1. They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  2. The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  3. That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  4. That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  5. They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  6. They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.

Copyright
Authors who publish with JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Licensing for Data Publication

JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching uses a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.