Difference Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) and Discovery Learning (Dl) on Results Study and Motivation Study Students At Bonding Materials Chemistry in Senior High School

Authors

  • Amanda Zefanya Situmeang Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
  • Elfrida Ginting Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jtp.v9i2.11202

Keywords:

Learning Results, Motivation Learning, Problem Based Learning, Discovery Learning, Chemical Bonding

Abstract

This research aims to: (1) determine the differences in student learning outcomes taught using the Problem Based Learning (PBL) and Discovery Learning (DL) models on chemical bonding material. (2) determine the differences in students' learning motivation who are taught using the Problem Based Learning (PBL) and Discovery Learning (DL) models on chemical bond material. (3) there is a correlation between motivation and learning outcomes of students who are taught using the Problem Based Learning (PBL) and Discovery Learning (DL) models on chemical bond material. This research was conducted at SMAN 11 Medan with the samples studied were X-3 and X-7. The instrument used is a test instrument in the form of multiple choice questions with 20 validated questions and a non-test in the form of a learning motivation questionnaire. Data analysis techniques are carried out by: Data normality test, data homogeneity test, hypothesis test, and correlation test. The results obtained: (1) There are differences in student learning outcomes taught using the Problem Based Learning and Discovery Learning models on chemical bonding material. The average student learning outcomes in experimental class I using Problem Based Learning was 74.8. Meanwhile, the average learning outcome for experimental class II using the Discovery Learning model was 79.6. (2) There were differences in the learning motivation of students who were taught using the Problem Based Learning and Discovery Learning models on chemical bond material. Meanwhile, the average learning motivation of students in experimental class I using Problem Based Learning is 67.6. Meanwhile, the average learning motivation in experimental class II which was taught using the Discovery learning model was 72.5. (3) There is a correlation between students and learning outcomes taught using the Problem Based Learning and Discovery Learning models on chemical bond material with a positive correlation value. In experimental class I obtained Sig. = 0.00 with Pearson Correlation = 0.795 and experimental class II Sig. = 0.000 with Pearson Correlation = 0.879.

References

Abanikannda, M. O. (2016). Influence of problem based learning in chemistry on academic achievement of high school students in Osun State, Nigeria. International Journal of Education, Learning and Development , 4(3), 55- 63.

Anita Lie. 2003. Cooperative Learning: Practicing Cooperative Learning in Classrooms . Jakarta: Gramedia.

Arifin, m 1995. Development Program Teaching Field Studies Chemistry . Surabaya : Airlangga University Press.

Bere R, Wariani T, Boelan EG. (2022). The Influence of Interest on Colloid Learning Outcomes Using the Discovery Learning Learning Model. J Educ Dev . 11(1), 128-132.

Berutu, J. (2022). Comparison of Student Learning Outcomes with the Project Based Learning Model And Problem Based Learning Helpful Media Chemsketch on Chemical Bonding Material. Indonesian Education Journal, 3 (07), 617-627.

Desriyanti, R., and Lazulva., (2016), Application of Problem Based Learning in Learning the Concept of Salt Hydrolysis to Improve Student Learning Outcomes. Tadris Chemistry Journal , 1(2): 70-78.

Emda, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh A. (2017). Position Motivation Study Student In Learning. Lanthanides J , 5(2), 93-196.

Gautama M, Emirence J. (2018). Enhancement Skills Solve Problems through the Problem Based Learning (PBL) Learning Model in Chemistry Subjects. Indonesian Kim Educator Journal , 2(1), 1-10.

Gunter, T., & Alpat, SK. (2017). The Effect of Problem Based Learning (PBL) on Performance Academic Student Which Learn "Electrochemistry". Chemistry Education Research and Practice , 18, 78-98.

Hadi, S. (2020). Quality Development Model in Educational Institutions. PENSA : Journal of Education and Social Sciences , 2 (3), 321–347.

Herlina H. (2020). Application Problem Based Learning For Increase Chemistry Learning Results on Hydrocarbon Materials. PENDIPA Sci Educ Journal , 4(3), 7-13.

Beautiful Langitsari, Titi Rogayah, Solfarina. (2021). Problem Based Learning (PBL) On the Topic of Atomic Structure: Activeness, Creativity and Student Learning Achievement, Journal of Chemical Education Innovation, 15(2).

Kharolinasari R, Susatyo EB, Sarwana. (2020). Developing Happy Chemist Interactive Learning Media on Hydrolysis Material to Measure Students' Understanding of Concepts. J Innovation Educator Kim, 14(1), 2547-2560

Downloads

Published

2024-04-28

How to Cite

Situmeang, A. Z., & Ginting, E. (2024). Difference Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) and Discovery Learning (Dl) on Results Study and Motivation Study Students At Bonding Materials Chemistry in Senior High School. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pembelajaran, 9(2), 293–300. https://doi.org/10.33394/jtp.v9i2.11202

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): April

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.

Copyright

  1. Authors who publish with JTP agree to the following terms:
  2. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
  5. Licensing for Data Publication

Licensing for Data Publication

JTP use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)