Interaksi Motivasi Belajar Tinggi Serta Rendah Versus Hasil Belajar Materi Perkakas Tangan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/jtp.v7i2.5427Keywords:
Low learning motivation, High learning motivation, learning outcomes, hand toolsAbstract
This research aims to research high and low learning motivation versus learning outcomes hand tool material. This research apply the Quasy Experiment method. While the research design is a 2 x 2 factorial. Furthermore, for the data collection method using the cluster random sampling method. The sample of research was 144 students. Furthermore, several series of tests were held, including: validity test, reliability test, prerequisite test (test of homogeneity, normality, and one way ANOVA) and hypothesis testing (two way ANOVA test). This questionnaire consists of 36 questionnaires so that the highest is 144 and the lowest is 36. From scores obtained, it can be grouped into 2 categories, namely students with low motivation and high motivation categories. Students with low motivation category if they get a score between 36-89 and students with high motivation category if they get a score between 90-144. All samples in this study were given a learning motivation questionnaire and then grouped according to the categories of students with high learning motivation categories and students with low learning motivation categories. The results of this research show that there is a comparison between students who have high learning motivation and students who have low learning motivation on the learning outcomes of hand tools in class X SMKN 1 Driyorejo and SMKS YPM 8 Sidoarjo in the 2021-2022 academic year.
References
Alizadeh, M. (2016). The Impact of Motivation on English Language Learning. International Journal of Higher Education, 1(1).
Chen, M. R. A., Hwang, G. J., & Chang, Y. Y. (2019). A reflective thinking-promoting approach to enhancing graduate students’ flipped learning engagement, participation behaviors, reflective thinking and project learning outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12823
Elis Warti. (2016). Pengaruh Motivasi Belajar Siswa terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa di SD Angkasa 10 Halim Perdana Kusuma Jakarta Timur. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika.
Hasbullah, & Zainudin. (2020). Penerapan Motivasi Belajar Santri Di Pondok Pesantren Miftahul Ishlah Tembelok Menurut Hamzah B.Uno. Journal of Healthcare Technology and Medicine, II.
Putri, N. P., & Muzakkir. (2018). Pengaruh Media Tutorial Berbentuk Film (Motion Pictures) terhadap Motivasi Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 3, 60–70.
Putri, S. D., & Muzakkir. (2019). Pengaruh Strategi The Power of Two terhadap Motivasi Belajar Siswa Kelas VIII pada Mata Pelajaran Aqidah dan Akhlak. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 4, 92–103.
Rahman, S. (2021). Pentingnya motivasi belajar dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar. November, 289–302.
Saifulloh, A. M., & Darwis, M. (2020). Manajemen Pembelajaran dalam Meningkatkan Efektivitas Proses Belajar Mengajar di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Bidayatuna: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Mandrasah Ibtidaiyah, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.36835/bidayatuna.v3i2.638
Septiana Sari, F. (2016). Peran Pembelajaran Regulasi Diri dalam Menumbuhkan Motivasi Belajar Anak Usia 5-6 Tahun. Modeling: Jurnal Program Studi PGMI, 3(2).
Setyosari, P., Zubaidah, S., Malang, U. N., & Ulfa, S. (2017). The Effect of Flipped Classroom Model through Handout and Virtual Approaches on Learning Outcomes for the Students of Universitas Terbuka Who Have Different Level of Motivation and Learning. Global Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematic, 13(January 2018).
Sugiyono, S. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R & D.
Suhaedir Bachtiar, D. S. (2021). Variabel Dalam Penelitian Pendidikan : Kajian Berbasis Riset. Pustaka Literas.
Wulandari, & Hadi Gunawan Sakti. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Jigsaw terhadap Motivasi Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 4, 70–77.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
- Authors who publish with JTP agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- Licensing for Data Publication
Licensing for Data Publication
JTP use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)