Development of ThreeË—Tier Diagnostic Test Instrument to Measure Misconceptions of Class XI Students on Reaction Rate Materials
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/jtp.v8i1.6192Keywords:
reaction rate, misconception, threeË—tier multiple choiceAbstract
This study aims to measure and detect student misconceptions that occur in the concept of reaction rate based on the diagnosis results of Grade XI Negeri 2 Kabanjahe students and to show subconceptions that experienced both high and low misconceptions. The study was conducted in March–April 2022. The type of research used is Research and Development with ADDIE development. Methods used are tests, anchors, interviews and documentation. The diagnostic test developed is a threetitier multiple choice diagnostic test consisting of an answer choice, reason and confidence level. Validation result by validator indicates the developed instrument is valid. The validity of the developed test is 20 valid problems and 10 invalid problems. Reliability test results show a reliability figure of 0.85. The highest percentage of misconceptions in collision theory is 51.5% and the lowest percentage of misconceptions in reaction order and reaction rate equations is 26.72%. The percentage of students who understand the concept of reaction rate is 35%. The percentage of categories did not understand the concept of reaction rate by 27% and the percentage of misconceptions of reaction rate by 38%.
References
Arikunto, S. (2010). DasarË—Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
__________. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rikena Cipta.
Ardiansah, Masykuri, M., & Rahardjo, S. B. (2018). Senior High School Students’ Need Analysis of Three-Tier Multiple Choice (3TMC) Diagnostic Test about Acid-Base and Solubility Equilibrium. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1022, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1022/1/012033
Asmalinda, Ruslan, & Sulastry Taty. (2019). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Diagnostik Tiga Tingkat dan Alternatif Remedial pada Pembelajaran Kimia Kelas X SMA (Studi pada Materi Struktur Atom). Chemistry Education Review, 3(1), 99–108.
Bagiyono. (2017). Analisis Tingkat Kesukaran dan Daya Pembeda Butir Soal Ujian Pelatihan Radiografi Tingkat 1 (The Analysis of Difficulty Level and Discrimination Power of Test Items of Radiography Level 1 Examination). Widyanuklida, 16(1), 1–12. http://repo-nkm.batan.go.id/140/1/05_analisis_tingkat_kesukaran.pdf
Dwinata, R. A., Efendi, R., & Yudha, S. P. (2016). Rancang Bangun Aplikasi Tabel Periodik Unsur dan Perumusan Senyawa Kimia dari Unsur Kimia Dasar Berbasis Android. Jurnal Rekursif, 4(2), 176–183.
Fadhilah, Jusniar, & Anwar, M. (2020). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Kelas XI IPA 1 SMA Negeri 1 Ma’rang pada Materi Pokok Laju Reaksi. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Kimia, 1(1), 41–50. https://ojs.unm.ac.id/ChemEdu/article/view/17526/0
Fahmi, F., & Irhasyuarna, Y. (2017). Misconceptions of Reaction Rates on High School Level in Banjarmasin. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 7(1), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0701045461
Jannah, M., Ningsih, P., & Ratman, R. (2017). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Kelas XI SMA Negeri 1 Banawa Tengah pada Pembelajaran Larutan Penyangga dengan CRI (Certainty of Response Index). Jurnal Akademika Kimia, 5(2), 85–90. https://doi.org/10.22487/j24775185.2016.v5.i2.8019
Maulini, S., Kurniawan, Y., & Muliyani, R. (2016). The Three Tier-Test untuk Mengungkap Kuantitas Siswa Yang Miskonsepsi pada Konsep Gaya Pegas. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 1(2), 42–44. https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v2i2.222
Nurhayati, Alsagaf, S. L. H., & Wahyudi. (2019). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Three-Tier Multiple Choice untuk Mengukur Konsepsi Fisika Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan, 4(2), 47–54.
Nurpratami, H., Farida, I., & Helsy, I. (2015). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar pada Materi Laju Reaksi Berorientasi Multipel Representasi Kimia. Simposium Nasional Inovasi Pembelajaran Sains, 353–356.
Peşman, H., & Eryilmaz, A. (2010). Development of a Three-Tier Test to Assess Misconceptions About Simple Electric Circuits. Journal of Educational Research, 103(3), 208–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903383002
Prastyaninda, F. A., Pujayanto, & Budiharti, R. (2014). Penerapan Model Evaluasi Diary Book pada Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Numbered Heads Together (NHT) untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif dan Kognitif Fisika Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri Gondangrejo. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Sebelas Maret, 2(2), 20–24.
Saat, R. M., Fadzil, H. M., Aziz, N. A., Haron, K. A., Rashid, K. A., & Shamsuar, N. R. (2016). Development of An Online Three-Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess Pre-University Students’ Understanding of Cellular Respiration. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(4), 532–546.
Shalihah, A., Mulhayayiah, D., & Alatas, F. (2016). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Menggunakan Tes Diagnostik Three-Tier pada Hukum Newton dan Penerapannya. Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics, 1(1), 24–33.
Silitonga, P. M. (2014). Statistik: Teori dan Aplikasi dalam Penelitian. Medan: FMIPA Unimed
Siswaningsih, W., Anisa, N., Komalasari, N. E., & R, I. (2014). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Two-Tier untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi pada Materi Kimia Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 19(1), 117–127.
Triyono. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Ombak
Yulianti, L. (2008). Pengembangan Pembelajaran IPA SD. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang
Yunitasari, W., Susilowati, E., & Nurhayati, N. D. (2013). Pembelajaran Direct Instruction Disertai Hierarki Konsep untuk Mereduksi Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Materi Larutan Penyangga Kelas XI IPA Semester Genap SMA Negeri 2 Sragen Tahun Ajaran 2012/2013. Jurnal PendidikanKimia (JPK), 2(3), 182–190.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
- Authors who publish with JTP agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- Licensing for Data Publication
Licensing for Data Publication
JTP use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)