Is One Page Lesson Plan Better?: Voices of English Teachers

Authors

  • Ni Kadek Nita Rahayu Ganesha University of Education, Indonesia
  • I.G.A. Lokita Purnamika Utami Ganesha University of Education, Indonesia
  • Ida Ayu Made Istri Utami Ganesha University of Education, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v9i3.3808

Keywords:

English Teachers, Lesson Plan, Perception

Abstract

Lesson plan is an essential part in teaching and learning process. Recently, the government was released the Circular Letter number 14 of 2019 regarding to the simplification of lesson plan. It announced that one-page lesson plan as the new lesson plan format used in Indonesia. The one-page lesson plan format is shorter than the previous lesson plan, where the teachers only required to fulfill 3 main components and the other components are belonging to non-compulsory components. One-page lesson plan has three principles, namely effective, efficient, and student-oriented. This study aims at analyzing the English teachers' perspectives toward the one-page lesson plan principles at SMKN 3 Singaraja. The study was designed with a case study qualitative approach. The data were gathered by conducting an in-depth interview with the teachers. The study was involved four English teachers at SMKN 3 Singaraja. This study shows all of the English teachers have the same perspectives on one-page lesson plan principles that one-page lesson plan is more effective, efficient, and student-oriented if compared to the previous lesson plan format. The findings of this study imply that one-page lesson plan format helps the teachers easier to design an efficient, effective and more student-oriented instruction.

Author Biographies

Ni Kadek Nita Rahayu, Ganesha University of Education

English Language Education

I.G.A. Lokita Purnamika Utami, Ganesha University of Education

English Language Education

Ida Ayu Made Istri Utami, Ganesha University of Education

English Language Education

References

Brata, E. (2020). Tanya Jawab Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran (RPP). Buku Saku, 1–20. Circular Letter Number 14 of 2019 concerning the Simplification of the Lesson Plan.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education (8th Edition). New York: Routledge.

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research Design Qualitative Quantitative and mixed methods Approaches.

Ellis, R. (2019). Towards a modular language curriculum for using tasks. Language Teaching Research, 23(4), 454–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818765315

Gani, S. A., Zulfikar, T., & Sulisdawati1, T. (2017). Perceptions of English Teachers. English Education Journal (EEJ), 8(4), 503–517. http://jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/EEJ/article/view/9213

Haerazi, H., Prayti, Z., & Vikasari, R. M. (2019). Practicing contextual teaching and learning (CTL) approach to improve students’ reading comprehension in relation to motivation. ENGLISH REVIEW: Journal of English Education, 8(1), 139–146. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v8i1.2011

Haynes, A. (2010). The Complete Guide to Lesson Planning and Preparation. Continuum International Publishing Group.

Jacobs, C. L., Martin, S. N., & Otieno, T. C. (2008). A science lesson plan analysis instrument for formative and summative program evaluation of a teacher education program. Science Education, 92(6), 1096–1126. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20277

Jamali Nasari, A., & Heidari, M. (2014). The important role of lesson plan on educational achievement of Iranian EFL teachers' attitudes. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 2(5), 27-34.

Maba, W., & Mantra, I. B. N. (2018). The primary school teachers’ competence in implementing the 2013 curriculum. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 42, p. 00035). EDP Sciences.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014).Qualitative Data Analysis A Method Sourcebook. In Sage Publications (3rd ed.). SAGE Publication Inc.

Namdar, B., & Kucuk, M. (2018). Preservice Science Teachers’ Practices of Critiquing and Revising 5E Lesson Plans. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(6), 468–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1469188

Palobo, M., Sianturi, M., Marlissa, I., Purwanty, R., Dadi, O., & Saparuddin, A. (2018, October). Analysis of Teachers’ difficulties on Developing Curriculum 2013 Lesson Plans. In 1st International Conference on Social Sciences (ICSS 2018). Atlantis Press.

Saputra, D. B. (2019). The Implementation of Curriculum 2013: English Teachers’ Perceptions on Developing Lesson Plan and Teaching Materials. Linguists: Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 5(2). 54-67.

Trigueros, R. L. (2018). Lesson Plan. English Language Teaching. Retrieved from Research Gate:https://www.researchgate.net/publication

Umami, I. (2018). Moderating influence of curriculum, pedagogy, and assessment practices on learning outcomes in Indonesian secondary education. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 9(1), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.17499/jsser.37505

Worden-Chambers, D. (2020). The role of conceptual metaphors in novice teachers’ developing curricular knowledge: a case from second language writing. Teacher Development, 24(2), 184–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2020.1743350

Widodo, H. P. (2018). A Critical Micro-semiotic Analysis of Values Depicted in the Indonesian Ministry of National Education-Endorsed Secondary School English Textbook. Springer International Publishing, 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63677-1_8

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2021-07-27

How to Cite

Rahayu, N. K. N., Utami, I. L. P., & Utami, I. A. M. I. (2021). Is One Page Lesson Plan Better?: Voices of English Teachers. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 9(3), 326–335. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v9i3.3808

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 3 (2021)

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  1. They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  2. The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  3. That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  4. That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  5. They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  6. They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.

Copyright
Authors who publish with JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Licensing for Data Publication

JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching uses a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.